Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SpyLog VS SSHGuard

Compare SpyLog VS SSHGuard and see what are their differences

SpyLog logo SpyLog

Monitor logs from several sources and execute actions based on some rules.

SSHGuard logo SSHGuard

SSHGuard monitors services through their logging activity.
  • SpyLog Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15
  • SSHGuard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-06

SpyLog features and specs

  • Open Source
    SpyLog is open source, which means it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This encourages community collaboration and transparency.
  • Lua Integration
    SpyLog is specifically designed for Lua, allowing seamless integration with Lua applications, which is beneficial for developers using Lua extensively.
  • Lightweight
    The library is lightweight, making it suitable for applications that require minimal resource usage and efficient performance.
  • Customizable Logging
    SpyLog offers customizable logging functionality, enabling developers to tailor logging according to their project's requirements.

Possible disadvantages of SpyLog

  • Limited Documentation
    There may be limited documentation available, making it challenging for new users to understand and implement the library efficiently.
  • Community Support
    As a niche tool, it might have a smaller user base, leading to less community support and fewer third-party resources compared to more popular logging libraries.
  • Lua Specificity
    Being designed for Lua limits its use to Lua projects, which may not be suitable for developers working in other programming languages.

SSHGuard features and specs

  • Log Monitoring
    SSHGuard monitors log files for suspicious activity related to SSH, ensuring that any potential intrusion attempts are detected promptly.
  • Automatic Blocking
    It can automatically block IP addresses that show malicious behavior, reducing the risk of repeated attacks from the same source.
  • Lightweight
    SSHGuard is lightweight and efficient in terms of resource usage, making it suitable for a variety of server environments.
  • Compatibility
    SSHGuard is compatible with multiple log formats and integrates well with existing firewall systems such as iptables and pf.
  • Scalability
    It can handle a large number of log entries and is suitable for both small and large server infrastructures.

Possible disadvantages of SSHGuard

  • Limited Protocol Support
    While SSHGuard is effective for SSH attacks, its support for other protocols is limited compared to more comprehensive security solutions.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration may be challenging for users unfamiliar with firewall rules and log formats.
  • Not a Replacement for Comprehensive Security
    SSHGuard should not be relied upon as the sole security measure; it's best used as part of a layered security strategy.
  • False Positives
    There is a potential risk of false positives, which may lead to legitimate IPs being blocked unintentionally.

SpyLog videos

No SpyLog videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SSHGuard videos

How To install SSHGuard On Centos 7.3

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SpyLog and SSHGuard)
Cyber Security
46 46%
54% 54
Web Application Security
46 46%
54% 54
Monitoring Tools
46 46%
54% 54
Security
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using SpyLog and SSHGuard. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SSHGuard seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SpyLog mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SpyLog yet. Tracking of SpyLog recommendations started around Mar 2021.

SSHGuard mentions (1)

  • Whats with all the hacking/attacks?
    There are now better defensive tools (I use https://sshguard.net/); not that there are any accounts on this system that are vulnerable, but it does keep the relevant logfile from growing to astronomical size. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SpyLog and SSHGuard, you can also consider the following products

Fail2ban - Intrusion prevention framework

RdpGuard - RdpGuard allows you to protect your Remote Desktop (RDP), POP3, FTP, SMTP, IMAP, MSSQL, MySQL, VoIP/SIP from brute-force attacks by blocking attacker's IP address. Fail2Ban for Windows.

IPBan - Block hacking attempts on RDP, SSH, SMTP and much more

Denyhosts - The idea of denying access to SSH servers is nothing new and I was inspired by many other scripts...

CrowdSec - CrowdSec is a security automation engine, using both local IP behavior detection & our community-driven IP reputation database.

Anti DDoS Guardian - Stops RDP Brute force attack as well as DDoS agaist IIS, FTP, SMTP, and several more.