Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Sorry-cypress VS CodeceptJS

Compare Sorry-cypress VS CodeceptJS and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Sorry-cypress logo Sorry-cypress

An open-source on-premise, self-hosted alternative to cypress dashboard - sorry-cypress/sorry-cypress

CodeceptJS logo CodeceptJS

SuperCharged End 2 End Testing with WebDriver & Puppeteer
  • Sorry-cypress Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • CodeceptJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Sorry-cypress features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CodeceptJS features and specs

  • Unified Testing Framework
    CodeceptJS uses the BDD-style syntax to write tests, which makes it easier to read and write. It supports multiple backend drivers such as WebDriver, Protractor, Puppeteer, and Playwright, allowing flexibility in test automation.
  • Interactive Debugging
    It offers an interactive debugging mode, where you can pause tests and interact with the application in a browser, making it easier to diagnose and fix issues.
  • Scenario-based Testing
    Provides a scenario-based testing approach that is easy to understand and helps create more structured and organized test cases.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    CodeceptJS has a variety of plugins available that can extend its capabilities, such as allure reports, UI-based test execution, and advanced interface configurations.
  • Automatic Waiting
    With its built-in automatic waiting system, testers don't need to write explicit waits or sleeps, reducing flakiness in test scripts.

Possible disadvantages of CodeceptJS

  • Learning Curve
    While CodeceptJS simplifies many aspects of testing, it requires initial learning and adaptation for those not familiar with its scenario-driven testing approach or JavaScript.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up CodeceptJS with the different supported drivers can be complex, especially for beginners or those who are not familiar with JavaScript-based test automation.
  • Community and Support
    Although gaining popularity, the community size is relatively smaller compared to some other testing frameworks, which may lead to limited resources or solutions when facing complex issues.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction layers that CodeceptJS provides, while useful, can sometimes lead to performance overhead compared to writing raw scripts with lower-level libraries directly.

Sorry-cypress videos

+ Add

Cypress for beginners | Execute test in PARALLEL with sorry-cypress locally

More videos:

  • Review - Sorry-Cypress como alternativa al dashboard de Cypress🤔

CodeceptJS videos

+ Add

Testing with NightwatchJS, Introduction to CodeceptJS, CodeceptJS + Playright and Cypress journey

More videos:

  • Review - Video #10 For a better tests Management with CodeceptJS & Docker
  • Review - CodeceptUI - bringing Cypress like experience to CodeceptJS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sorry-cypress and CodeceptJS)

Sorry-cypress

CodeceptJS

Automated Testing
40 40%
Automated Testing
60% 60
Website Testing
39 39%
Website Testing
61% 61
Browser Testing
31 31%
Browser Testing
69% 69
Dev Ops
100 100%
Dev Ops
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Sorry-cypress and CodeceptJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeceptJS should be more popular than Sorry-cypress. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sorry-cypress mentions (1)

  • Scaling Cypress Tests: Parallelise your End-to-End Tests with Testkube
    Cypress offers features like test parallelization and analytics that help teams quicken their testing process. While initially expensive, it now has a free tier with limitations on the number of parallel tests you can run. To overcome this barrier, open-source alternatives like SorryCypress and managed solutions like Currents.dev emerged, offering unlimited parallelization and features previously exclusive to... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

CodeceptJS mentions (10)

  • Automation Framework Design
    But honestly, it may be preferable for you to use a single framework that does support both technologies (Web and Mobile) out of the box like webdriver.io or codecept. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Comparing Full Page Screenshots, Cross-Device
    There are different tools for visual screenshot testing, like BackstopJS, and Cypress.io also has a screenshot() function. In this series, I focus on writing tests with CodeceptJS. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • How to Accelerate Selenide Tests with Playwright
    CodeceptJS – A wrapper for different tools in one interface. Language: JavaScript/TypeScript. Frameworks that are wrapped: Playwright, Webdriver.io, Puppeteer, Protractor, etc. The service also comes with a large community and is easy to install and use for e2e testing. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Cypress vs WebDriverIO vs Selenium, and more — The ULTIMATE comparison among testing frameworks
    I'm saddened codeceptJS wasn't even mentioned. It's easily better than most of the ones listed except Cypress. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Testing React Apps in 2022 with Cypress: An In-Depth Guide for Beginners
    Back when I was doing FE, I found https://codecept.io, which is the same concept as Cypress but with a Playwright driver. Have not used but thought it's worth a mention. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sorry-cypress and CodeceptJS, you can also consider the following products

Testkit - Testkit makes it super easy to create tests - just use our browser extension to record user interactions and create assertions. Additionally, Testkit automatically fixes flakiness and tests if they break, so you can focus on building!

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Loading...