Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Sonic XML Server VS Apache Axiom

Compare Sonic XML Server VS Apache Axiom and see what are their differences

Sonic XML Server logo Sonic XML Server

Considering Sonic XML Server for your business? Updated for 2020! Access FAQ and important tips before choosing.

Apache Axiom logo Apache Axiom

XML Databases
  • Sonic XML Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-14
  • Apache Axiom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-11

Sonic XML Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Sonic XML Server is designed to efficiently handle XML data, offering fast processing times due to its optimized architecture.
  • Scalability
    The server can scale to accommodate increasing loads, making it a good fit for growing businesses that anticipate increased traffic and data processing needs.
  • Integration
    Sonic XML Server offers robust integration capabilities, allowing for seamless communication with other systems and services.
  • Security
    The server includes security features designed to protect data in transit and at rest, ensuring that sensitive information is well guarded.

Possible disadvantages of Sonic XML Server

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and may require specialized knowledge or training.
  • Cost
    The cost of Sonic XML Server might be prohibitive for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets, due to licensing fees and potential need for additional hardware.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running the server can be resource-intensive, requiring significant hardware resources which may lead to increased operational costs.
  • Limited Support
    Users might find that support options are limited or inadequate, potentially leading to delays in resolving technical issues.

Apache Axiom features and specs

  • Memory Efficiency
    Apache Axiom uses a pull-based model called deferred building, which helps manage memory usage efficiently. It constructs the XML infoset lazily, meaning that it only parses parts of the document as needed, reducing memory overhead when dealing with large XML files.
  • Streaming API
    Axiom provides a streaming API that allows processing of XML data incrementally as it is being read. This is particularly useful for applications that need to handle large streams of XML data without loading the entire document into memory.
  • Flexibility
    The library supports both DOM and StAX APIs, allowing developers to choose the most suitable API for their use case. This flexibility can help in integrating Axiom into different types of XML processing workflows.
  • SOAP Optimization
    Axiom is designed with SOAP messages in mind and provides built-in support for processing SOAP Envelopes. Its ability to handle and optimize SOAP-related tasks is a significant advantage for applications in the Web Services domain.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Axiom

  • Complexity
    The usage of a deferred building model and various supported APIs can introduce complexity, especially for developers who are unfamiliar with streaming models or who come from a DOM-based background.
  • Limited Documentation
    Some users may find the documentation to be lacking in comprehensive examples and detailed explanations, which can hinder the learning process and effective utilization of the library.
  • Performance Overhead
    While Axiom is efficient with memory usage, there can be performance overhead associated with its deferred processing model, particularly in scenarios where the entire XML content is rapidly accessed or modified.
  • Niche Use Cases
    Axiom is particularly suited for scenarios involving SOAP messages. For general-purpose XML processing, especially in simpler applications, its advanced features may be overkill, making more lightweight libraries more appropriate.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sonic XML Server and Apache Axiom)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
43 43%
57% 57
Task Management
43 43%
57% 57
Text Editors
47 47%
53% 53

User comments

Share your experience with using Sonic XML Server and Apache Axiom. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Axiom seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sonic XML Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Sonic XML Server yet. Tracking of Sonic XML Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Axiom mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sonic XML Server and Apache Axiom, you can also consider the following products

MarkLogic - Schema-agnostic Enterprise NoSQL database technology, coupled w/ powerful search & flexible application services

Qizx - XML Databases

BaseX - BaseX is a very light-weight, high-performance and scalable XML Database engine and XPath/XQuery...

Apache Xerces - Advanced XML parser, including support for XML Schema, DOM Level 2, and SAX.

Apache Anakia - XML Databases

IBM App Connect - IBM App Connect is the all-in-one integration tool for connecting apps, integrating data, building APIs and acting on events