Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Software Manager VS pacman (package manager)

Compare Software Manager VS pacman (package manager) and see what are their differences

CobbleStone Software
Managing contracts just got easier with CobbleStone! featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Software Manager logo Software Manager

A software manager for the ...

pacman (package manager) logo pacman (package manager)

The pacman package manager is one of the major distinguishing features of ...
  • Software Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27
  • pacman (package manager) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-07

Software Manager features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Software Manager provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate graphical user interface, making it accessible for users who are not comfortable using the command line.
  • Curated Software Selection
    The platform offers a selection of curated applications, ensuring that users have access to reliable and well-maintained software options.
  • Integration with Linux Mint
    Software Manager is specifically integrated with Linux Mint, which allows for seamless updates and compatibility with the Linux Mint ecosystem.
  • Review and Rating System
    Users can view and submit reviews and ratings for software, helping them make informed decisions based on community feedback.
  • One-Click Installations
    This feature enables users to install applications with a single click, simplifying the installation process and saving time.

Possible disadvantages of Software Manager

  • Limited Software Repository
    Compared to other package managers like Synaptic, Software Manager may have a more limited selection of available software packages.
  • Performance Issues
    Users have reported that Software Manager can be slow to load and operate, particularly on systems with limited resources.
  • Occasional Stability Problems
    There can be occasional crashes or freezes, which may disrupt the user's experience, although these issues are not universal.
  • Less Control for Advanced Users
    Advanced users might find the simplified interface lacking in options for customizing installation details and accessing backend package management tasks.
  • Dependency Management Limitations
    In some cases, Software Manager may not handle complex dependencies as effectively as command-line package managers, potentially leading to installation issues.

pacman (package manager) features and specs

  • Speed
    Pacman is known for its fast performance in handling package operations such as installation, updates, and removal.
  • Dependency Resolution
    Pacman handles dependencies automatically, ensuring that all required libraries and software are installed and up to date.
  • Simple Syntax
    It features a straightforward and easy-to-remember syntax for commands, making it user-friendly for both new and experienced users.
  • Rolling Release Model
    Pacman supports Arch Linux's rolling release model, providing users with the latest software versions without needing to upgrade to a new OS version.
  • AUR Support
    Pacman works well with the Arch User Repository (AUR) through tools like `yay` or `aurman`, giving users access to a vast collection of community-maintained packages.
  • Customizability
    The package manager is highly customizable, allowing users to configure it according to their preferences and needs.

Possible disadvantages of pacman (package manager)

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might find Pacman difficult to use initially, especially if they are not familiar with command-line interfaces.
  • Less Handholding
    Unlike some other package managers, Pacman assumes a certain level of knowledge about the system, which can be daunting for beginners.
  • Manual Interventions
    Occasionally, updates might require manual interventions, which can be complex and require a good understanding of the underlying system.
  • No Graphical Interface
    Pacman lacks an official graphical user interface (GUI), which some users may find inconvenient.
  • Limited Official Repositories
    Although AUR provides an extensive range of packages, the official repositories are not as vast compared to some other distributions, potentially requiring users to rely on community packages.

Analysis of pacman (package manager)

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Pacman is considered a very good package manager, particularly for users who value a minimalist and efficient tool in managing software packages on a Linux system. Its speed, simplicity, and reliability make it a preferred choice for many Arch Linux users.

Why this product is good

  • Pacman is the default package manager for Arch Linux and its derivatives. It is renowned for its simplicity and speed in package management, offering a clear and concise command syntax. Pacman efficiently handles package updates, installations, and removals, keeping the system up to date with the latest software. Additionally, it has robust dependency management, ensuring all required dependencies are handled automatically during installations.

Recommended for

    Pacman is especially recommended for those who use Arch Linux or its derivatives, like EndeavourOS and Manjaro, as well as users who appreciate a hands-on approach to Linux and enjoy customizing their environment. It's well-suited for advanced Linux users who want more control over their system.

Software Manager videos

+ Add

CA Mainframe Software Manager Review (Real User Review)

pacman (package manager) videos

No pacman (package manager) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Software Manager and pacman (package manager))

Software Manager

pacman (package manager)

SaaS Management
100 100%
SaaS Management
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
License Management
100 100%
License Management
0% 0
Package Manager
0 0%
Package Manager
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Software Manager and pacman (package manager). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pacman (package manager) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Software Manager mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Software Manager yet. Tracking of Software Manager recommendations started around Mar 2021.

pacman (package manager) mentions (39)

  • Been thinking of switching to linux but I am a noob
    However, that "pacman -S" command has lots of switches (see section 1.1.1 ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman ). Source: over 1 year ago
  • How to build Software as a Service (SaaS) Notes application with mySQL/MariaDB and Apache in 300 lines of code
    Install Vely - you can use standard packaging tools such as apt, dnf, pacman or zypper. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Project on GitHub - Customizable Arch Linux Podman images based on the official Arch Linux Docker image
    Automatic installation of packages during building utilizes pacman and aurman with the supported "package sources" being:. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • A response to the Fedora 40 Privacy-Preserving Telemetry Proposal
    * Package management and DNF syntax usage are big topics. Follow the Arch Wiki example for the "pacman" package management tool ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Could someone make a Decky plugin that automates installing common dependencies?
    Should be possible as the Arch distro SteamOS is built on includes pacman. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Software Manager and pacman (package manager), you can also consider the following products

SnowSoftware - Snow Software are suppliers of Software Asset Management products and help optimizing licensing & minimizing compliance risk.

Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS

ServiceNow Software Asset Management - Software can represent more than 20% of IT budgets and managing it can be complicated.

Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.

SoftwareKey Licensing System - SoftwareKey System is a set of software development tools that help programmers implement copy protection, license activation and management, metering, eCommerce, and business automation.

Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.

Loading...