Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Snarkdown VS Pygments

Compare Snarkdown VS Pygments and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Snarkdown logo Snarkdown

The super fast, 1kb Markdown parser in JavaScript

Pygments logo Pygments

Generic syntax highlighter suitable for use in code hosting, forums, wikis or other applications...
  • Snarkdown Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-02
  • Pygments Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15

Snarkdown features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Snarkdown is extremely lightweight compared to other Markdown parsers, with a size of around 1KB when minified. This makes it ideal for situations where minimal overhead is essential.
  • Simplicity
    The library focuses on parsing only the basic Markdown syntax, making it straightforward and reducing complexity for developers who do not require advanced features.
  • Performance
    Due to its small size and simplified functionality, Snarkdown offers high performance, processing Markdown to HTML quickly and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    Snarkdown is simple to integrate into projects. With minimal setup required, it offers a quick way to add Markdown parsing capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Snarkdown

  • Limited Features
    Snarkdown supports a basic subset of Markdown features, which may not be sufficient for users needing more advanced Markdown syntax support like tables or custom attributes.
  • Lack of Extensibility
    The parser is not designed to be extensible, limiting users' ability to add custom Markdown features or plugins.
  • Basic Security
    Like many Markdown parsers, Snarkdown does not perform extensive sanitization, so users need to implement additional security measures to protect against XSS attacks.
  • No Update Frequency
    With a minimalist design and focus, Snarkdown may not be as frequently updated or maintained as larger, more feature-rich projects, which can lead to potential stagnation in improvements or support.

Pygments features and specs

  • Wide Language Support
    Pygments supports a broad range of programming languages and file formats, making it highly versatile for developers working in diverse environments.
  • High-Quality Output
    The library produces highly readable and aesthetically pleasing highlighted code, which is crucial for documentation and presentation.
  • Easy Integration
    Pygments is designed to integrate easily with a variety of web frameworks, content management systems, and text editors.
  • Customization Options
    Users can customize styles, themes, and output formats to meet specific needs, providing flexibility for different aesthetic requirements.
  • Active Community
    A strong, active community contributes to its continuous development and improvement, ensuring it stays updated with the latest languages and features.

Possible disadvantages of Pygments

  • Performance Overhead
    For large codebases or high-frequency requests, using Pygments can introduce performance overhead, potentially slowing down applications.
  • Dependency Management
    As with any library, integrating Pygments means managing its dependencies and ensuring compatibility with other project components.
  • Complexity in Advanced Use
    While basic usage is straightforward, more advanced features and customizations can introduce complexity, requiring a deeper understanding of the library.
  • Limited Built-In Features
    Pygments primarily focuses on syntax highlighting, so additional functionality (like code execution or detailed analysis) has to be handled by other tools or custom development.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Snarkdown and Pygments)
Competitive Intelligence
100 100%
0% 0
Documentation
0 0%
100% 100
SEO
100 100%
0% 0
Customer Feedback
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Snarkdown and Pygments. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pygments should be more popular than Snarkdown. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Snarkdown mentions (1)

  • How I reduced Raveberry's transferred frontend code by 90%
    Analyzing these dependencies, I found that some of them could be reduced or replaced. For example, jquery-ui is used for autocompletion and reordering. All additional widgets provided by jquery-ui (e.g. sliders, datepickers) are dead weight and can be excluded from the final bundle. Another example is marked, which was used to render the changelog. However, the changelog has a very simple structure and does not... Source: about 4 years ago

Pygments mentions (10)

  • Ask HN: Printing Code to Paper?
    Some starter ideas[0] beyond spacing/line numbers. BNF format is used to describe a programming language. treesitter as a text editor plug in makes use of a language BNF description to be able to know how to parse & format a given lanuage in a text editor (aka pygments[1], gnu source code hightlights, [2] neovim with treesitter[3]). Aka searching google "treesitter work with microsoft notepade" --- [0] :... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Marcel the Shell
    I suspect Pygments will be to your liking. https://pygments.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Blog in django
    It's not clear exactly what you want, but if you mean syntax highlighting, you could use pygments https://pygments.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • I'm looking for a way to display live changes to a text file with Python
    Https://pygments.org/ - never tried it though. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Markdown, Asciidoc, or reStructuredText - a tale of docs-as-code
    Sphinx is incredibly powerful and can offer a table of contents, automatic links for functions, automatic code highlighting using Pygments, and other capabilities using built-in or third-party extensions. If you'd like to use (a flavor of) Markdown with Sphinx, you can do so using MyST-parser - a Sphinx and Docutils extension to parse MyST. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Snarkdown and Pygments, you can also consider the following products

Marked.js - A full-featured markdown parser and compiler, written in JavaScript. Built for speed.

prism.js - Prism is a lightweight, extensible syntax highlighter, built with modern web standards in mind.

ShowdownJS - A Markdown to HTML converter written in JavaScript

Asciidoctor - In the spirit of free software, everyone is encouraged to help improve this project.

Markdown-it - High-speed Markdown parser with 100% CommonMark support, extensions & syntax plugins.

mdbook - Gitbook alternative in Rust