Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Slic3r VS Level.io

Compare Slic3r VS Level.io and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Slic3r logo Slic3r

STL-to-GCODE translator for RepRap printers Here comes Slic3r! Its features are: - speed

Level.io logo Level.io

Flexible, intuitive, and secure remote monitoring and management (RMM) software. Control and manage your devices securely, right in your browser, from anywhere in the world. Get started today.
  • Slic3r Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-27
  • Level.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-19

Level enables IT Professionals to remotely manage and monitor their workstations and servers from anywhere in the world. Level is the first security-focused remote monitoring and management (RMM) platform to implement peer-to-peer (P2P) connections that ensure a fully private and encrypted connection.

Slic3r

Website
slic3r.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Level.io

Website
level.io
$ Details
paid Free Trial $1.0 / Monthly (per device)
Platforms
Windows Mac OSX Linux
Release Date
2021 July

Slic3r features and specs

  • Open Source
    Slic3r is open-source software, so it is free to use and modify. This allows for community-driven improvements and customization.
  • Advanced Features
    Slic3r offers advanced features like variable layer height, customizable support structures, and multi-extruder support, which can be very beneficial for complex prints.
  • Cross-Platform
    The software is compatible with Windows, Mac, and Linux, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
  • Active Community
    Slic3r has an active user community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to problems and learn best practices.
  • Integration with Other Software
    Slic3r can be integrated with other software such as OctoPrint for seamless 3D printing operations and remote management.

Possible disadvantages of Slic3r

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The software offers a wide array of settings, which can be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with 3D printing workflows.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported that Slic3r can be slower than other slicing software when handling large models or complex settings.
  • Limited Direct Support
    Since it is open-source, there is no direct manufacturer support. Users rely on community forums and documentation for help.
  • Interface Usability
    The user interface is considered less intuitive compared to other slicing software available in the market, like PrusaSlicer or Cura.
  • Occasional Bugs
    As with many open-source software projects, occasional bugs and glitches can appear, affecting the stability and reliability of the software.

Level.io features and specs

  • Asset Management
  • Remote Control
  • Background Management
  • Monitoring & Alerting
  • Patch Management
  • Automated Remediation
  • Scripting

Analysis of Slic3r

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Slic3r is generally considered a good and reliable slicing software for 3D printing.

Why this product is good

  • Slic3r is praised for its open-source nature, flexibility, and powerful features. It offers a wide range of customization options and supports various types of 3D printers. The software provides advanced slicing capabilities, such as adaptive layer height, variable layer settings, and customizable support structures, which can enhance print quality and efficiency. Additionally, being part of the Prusa ecosystem, Slic3r is regularly updated and improved based on user feedback.

Recommended for

  • Hobbyists and professionals looking for a free, open-source slicing tool.
  • Users who require detailed control over print settings and configurations.
  • Those who are using Prusa printers or other compatible 3D printers.
  • Individuals who appreciate community-driven software with active development.

Slic3r videos

📌3DBenchy Top 3D Slicers Comparison Simplify3D vs Cura vs Slic3r vs Ideamaker vs Kiss vs Craftware

More videos:

  • Review - Slic3r and Cura: Which One is Better
  • Review - 3D printing guides - Setting up Slic3r

Level.io videos

Level Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Slic3r and Level.io)
3D
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Architecture
100 100%
0% 0
Remote IT Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Slic3r and Level.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Level.io seems to be a lot more popular than Slic3r. While we know about 34 links to Level.io, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Slic3r. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Slic3r mentions (3)

  • How would I split this model in Cura? (More details below)
    I split my Boba Fett helmet STL in Slic3r. It was incredibly easy to split the file into 8 parts. The top and bottom halves split at the visor line, then split those pieces into halves and then halves again so they will fit on the bed. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • What? Brim printed fine, but why is it doing this? Using Hatchbox PLA at 210 nozzle temp and 70 bed temp on an Ender 5 Plus. I'm using the Creality Slicer that came with
    Try using a diffent slicer. Either cura or slic3r. Source: over 3 years ago
  • tesla turbine style fan blade.
    I use Slic3r where the preview is quite easy to get, but the configuration might be a bit scary to get done (although the defaults are reasonable) as you want to try with adding or removing support material. Source: about 4 years ago

Level.io mentions (34)

  • Monitor Server Status Up or Down
    Level.io does this plus a whole lot more. As some have mentioned already, ideally there are lists of things to monitor. These can all be added to a policy along with up/down status and applied to devices. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Alternative to Teamviewer / AnyDesk for remote connection
    Level.io works from a browser, so no client needed on the controlling computer. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Web Application for running powershell locally
    With Level.io you can create a script library and then run them on one (or many) target devices. They could be run on the local client that is being used as well, which is what I believe you're asking for. This all works via an agent that checks in to the service and is responsible for the queueing and running off the scripts. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ticketing System + RMM recommendations
    Take a look at level.io for RMM. Free trial, no commitment, and no need to get a quote or talk to sales. Works for Windows, Mac, and Linux. Source: about 2 years ago
  • RMM software recommendations for a small business?
    I'd recommend checking out Level (https://level.io). They charge a flat $1 per endpoint. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Slic3r and Level.io, you can also consider the following products

Cura - Cura aims to be a end solution for personal 3D printing with RepRap based machines.

NinjaOne - NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools.

IceSL - Welcome to IceSL!

Atera - Atera is reinventing the world of IT by harnessing AI to power our all-in-one Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM), Helpdesk, Ticketing, and automations platform—streamlining organizational IT management at scale with our proprietary Action AI™.

MatterControl - MatterControl is a free, open source app that lets you organize and manage your 3D prints.

Tactical RMM - Tactical RMM is a remote monitoring & management tool for Windows computers, built with Django, Vue and Golang. It uses an agent written in Golang and integrates with MeshCentral