Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

skipfish VS Code42

Compare skipfish VS Code42 and see what are their differences

skipfish logo skipfish

A fully automated, active web application security reconnaissance tool.

Code42 logo Code42

Code42 is a SaaS solution for enterprises that secures all user data on one secure platform, leaving you and your business secure in the knowledge that both your employee's and customer's data is protected. Read more about Code42.
  • skipfish Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • Code42 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12

Code42

Website
code42.com
Release Date
2001 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
Minnesota
Founder(s)
Brian Bispala
Employees
500 - 999

skipfish features and specs

  • High-Speed Scanning
    Skipfish is designed to be fast, performing HTTP connections and handling multiple requests concurrently, which can significantly reduce the time it takes to scan a web application.
  • Recursive Crawling
    Skipfish employs recursive crawling and wordlists to discover hidden files and directories, providing a more comprehensive assessment of the target web application.
  • Effective Detection
    The tool is capable of identifying a wide range of security issues such as SQL injection, XSS, and other common web vulnerabilities through fuzzing techniques.
  • Minimal False Positives
    Skipfish is known for producing results with fewer false positives compared to other automated scanners, leading to more reliable outputs.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, Skipfish allows users to inspect, modify, and improve upon the source code according to their needs.

Possible disadvantages of skipfish

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The tool can be complex for beginners due to a lack of a graphical user interface (GUI) and the need for command-line proficiency, making it less approachable for those new to web security scanning.
  • Limited Support
    As an archived project on Google Code, Skipfish no longer receives updates or official support, which could be a limitation for users looking for the latest security testing features.
  • Resource Intensive
    The high speed and intensive scanning techniques may consume significant bandwidth and resources, potentially impacting the performance of the network and systems being tested.
  • Lack of Detailed Reporting
    The reporting features of Skipfish are relatively basic and might not meet the needs of users who require extensive details and customization in their security reports.
  • Potential for Overload
    Due to its aggressive scanning nature, there is a risk of overwhelming the target server, especially if not configured properly beforehand.

Code42 features and specs

  • Comprehensive Data Protection
    Code42 offers extensive data backup and recovery solutions, ensuring that user data is protected against loss or accidental deletion.
  • Real-Time Backup
    The platform provides real-time and continuous backups, minimizing data loss by ensuring the latest data is always protected.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Code42 supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility for diverse IT environments.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The software features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible even for users with limited technical knowledge.
  • Strong Security Measures
    Code42 implements robust encryption both in transit and at rest, ensuring that user data remains secure and confidential.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to scale with business growth, from small businesses to large enterprises, providing tailored solutions as needs evolve.
  • Centralized Management
    Administrators can manage and monitor all backups from a central dashboard, simplifying oversight and ensuring compliance with company policies.

Possible disadvantages of Code42

  • Cost
    Code42 can be expensive, especially for small businesses or startups that may have limited IT budgets.
  • Bandwidth Consumption
    Real-time backups can sometimes use significant bandwidth, potentially affecting other network activities if not managed properly.
  • Resource Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down older or less powerful systems during backup operations.
  • Complexity in Large Deployments
    While scalable, large enterprise deployments may require significant time and expertise to set up and manage effectively.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    Currently, Code42 offers limited functionality on mobile devices compared to its desktop application.

skipfish videos

Penetration Test with Skipfish

More videos:

  • Review - Skipfish Web Application Security Scanner Kali Linux tools [Hindi]
  • Review - Information Gathering with Kali Linux : Using skipfish to Explore a Web Server & App|packtpub.com

Code42 videos

Introducing Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection

More videos:

  • Review - MACOM Protects IP from Insider Threats with Code42 and Splunk
  • Review - You asked. We answered with Code42 CrashPlan 5.0

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to skipfish and Code42)
Monitoring Tools
16 16%
84% 84
Security
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Web Application Security
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using skipfish and Code42. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare skipfish and Code42

skipfish Reviews

We have no reviews of skipfish yet.
Be the first one to post

Code42 Reviews

Best Nessus Alternatives (Free and Paid) for 2021
Code42’s Threat and Vulnerability Management software monitors for vulnerabilities on an on-going basis. It also conducts monthly internal as well as external vulnerability scans using industry-recognized top-notch vulnerability scanning tools. Identified vulnerabilities are evaluated, documented, and remediated to avoid any potential risk of the data breach.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Code42 seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

skipfish mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of skipfish yet. Tracking of skipfish recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Code42 mentions (1)

  • Looking for the best cloud backup for all my files
    It's not a big surprise, given that Code42 (the parent company) pretends they have nothing to do with Crashplan. They've done a massive pivot to some kind of security company, with ZERO references to the OG product of Crashplan on code42.com, which (I'm guessing) is the bulk of their revenue. If you do a site search on google, you'll find some old links, but they just push you over to crashplan.com. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing skipfish and Code42, you can also consider the following products

Acunetix - Audit your website security and web applications for SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other...

Symantec Data Loss Prevention - Fully protect your data with the comprehensive detection technologies and unified policies of Symantec's industry leading Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

Shodan - Shodan is the world's first search engine for Internet-connected devices.

Microsoft BitLocker - BitLocker is a full disk encryption feature included with Windows Vista and later.

Horangi - Horangi is a leading cyber-security solution that provides instant response and threat detection for companies who lack the time and expertise to monitor their system.

Paubox - Paubox provides HIPAA compliant email encryption without the hassle of extra steps.