Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Siteleaf VS Jekyll-post-via-web

Compare Siteleaf VS Jekyll-post-via-web and see what are their differences

Siteleaf logo Siteleaf

Content management, simplified. Edit in the cloud, publish anywhere.

Jekyll-post-via-web logo Jekyll-post-via-web

Update your GitHub-hosted Jekyll blog from your browser
  • Siteleaf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • Jekyll-post-via-web Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

Siteleaf features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Siteleaf offers a clean and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for users to manage their content without deep technical knowledge.
  • Content Management System
    It acts as a robust CMS where users can organize and manage their websites easily, providing tools for editing, version control, and site structuring.
  • Jekyll Integration
    Siteleaf natively integrates with Jekyll, allowing users to deploy and manage static sites efficiently with the power of Jekyll's static site generator.
  • Cloud-Based
    Being cloud-based, Siteleaf allows users to access and manage their websites from anywhere, facilitating remote collaboration.
  • Team Collaboration Features
    It provides support for team collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same project with various roles and permissions.
  • Version Control
    Siteleaf includes version control capabilities, enabling users to track changes and revert to previous versions when needed.
  • Custom Themes and Plugins
    Users can customize their sites with themes and plugins, providing flexibility in design and functionality.

Possible disadvantages of Siteleaf

  • Dependency on Jekyll
    Users who are not familiar with Jekyll may face a learning curve, as Siteleaf heavily relies on Jekyll for static site generation.
  • Cost
    While Siteleaf offers several features, it may be cost-prohibitive for individuals or small projects compared to other free or lower-cost platforms.
  • Limited Dynamic Content
    As a static site generator, Siteleaf may not be suitable for websites requiring complex dynamic content or database-driven features.
  • Performance Constraints for Large Sites
    For very large sites with extensive content, managing and updating through a static site generator like Siteleaf might be less efficient compared to traditional CMS solutions.
  • Limited Template Flexibility
    While customization is possible, users might find limitations with more intricate layout designs compared to other advanced website builders.

Jekyll-post-via-web features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Siteleaf videos

Adding Siteleaf to a GitHub Pages site

More videos:

  • Review - SiteLeaf.com is NOT a Custom Management System

Jekyll-post-via-web videos

No Jekyll-post-via-web videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Siteleaf and Jekyll-post-via-web)
CMS
64 64%
36% 36
Website Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging
48 48%
52% 52
Website Design
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Siteleaf and Jekyll-post-via-web. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Siteleaf and Jekyll-post-via-web, you can also consider the following products

Google Sites - Access Google Sites with a free Google account (for personal use) or G Suite account (for business use).

Prose - Customized, professional hair care

Site.pro - The easiest way to build a website for website owners and hosting providers.

GitPress - A blog writing tool based on GitHub, designed for developers

Webflow - Build dynamic, responsive websites in your browser. Launch with a click. Or export your squeaky-clean code to host wherever you'd like. Discover the professional website builder made for designers.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.