Sitecake VS Oxidized

Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago

May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago

Or run a decent setup to keep backups, like this one: https://github.com/ytti/oxidized. Source: about 1 year ago

You didn't mention about brand of the switches, but majority of vendors is covered with Oxidized: https://github.com/ytti/oxidized Just configure it with git backend, and you have version control and device backups. Also, if you wish, there are bundled sone extra scripts that could report git changes via email. Source: about 1 year ago

RANCID was great before Oxidized ;) Https://github.com/ytti/oxidized From description of Oxi: Oxidized is a network device configuration backup tool. It's a RANCID replacement! Source: over 1 year ago

If you're just looking to backup/inventory configs, give Oxidized a try https://github.com/ytti/oxidized. Source: over 1 year ago

What about the tried and trusted oxidized? Source: over 1 year ago