Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

sish VS Smallstep SSH

Compare sish VS Smallstep SSH and see what are their differences

Setuply
Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

sish logo sish

An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Smallstep SSH logo Smallstep SSH

Single Sign-on SSH
  • sish Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • Smallstep SSH Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

sish features and specs

  • Open Source
    sish is open-source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the project's codebase.
  • Self-Hosted
    Users can host their own instance of sish, giving them complete control over their tunneling service and associated data.
  • Simple Setup
    The installation and setup process for sish is straightforward, requiring minimal configuration to get started.
  • Custom Subdomains
    sish allows users to utilize custom subdomains for their tunnels, enhancing branding and easier access.
  • Security Features
    Built-in support for TLS and authentication options, ensuring that tunnels are secure and accessible only to authorized users.
  • Portability
    sish supports multiple platforms, allowing it to be used in various environments such as local development, testing, or cloud deployment.

Possible disadvantages of sish

  • Self-Management
    Users need to manage their own server and configurations, which can require additional maintenance and oversight compared to managed services.
  • Resource Consumption
    Hosting your own instance of sish requires computational resources, which could be a con if the service is heavily used.
  • Complexity for Non-Developers
    Non-developers might find the setup and maintenance process challenging without prior experience in server management and configuration.
  • Limited Community Support
    As a niche project, sish may not have as large of a community or as many resources available for troubleshooting as more popular alternatives.
  • No Built-In Analytics
    Unlike some other tunneling services, sish does not provide built-in analytics or monitoring tools, requiring users to implement their own solutions.

Smallstep SSH features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Smallstep SSH enables strong authentication practices by integrating with identity providers, reducing the chances of compromised passwords and ensuring secure connections.
  • Centralized Access Management
    The platform centralizes user access management, allowing admins to easily manage and revoke user access across multiple servers and services from a single point of control.
  • Ease of Integration
    Smallstep SSH integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure and identity providers like Okta and Google Workspace, simplifying the onboarding process for enterprises.
  • Improved Compliance
    With detailed logging and custom policies, Smallstep SSH helps organizations meet various compliance requirements by offering traceability and accountability for user actions.
  • Scalability
    Designed with scalability in mind, Smallstep SSH can efficiently handle growing organizational needs without sacrificing performance or security.

Possible disadvantages of Smallstep SSH

  • Complexity of Setup
    For organizations unfamiliar with identity provider integrations or certificate-based authentication, the initial setup can be complex and may require specialized knowledge.
  • Dependence on External Identity Providers
    Reliance on external identity providers for authentication means that downtime or disruptions with these services can impact Smallstep SSH functionality.
  • Limited Offline Access
    Because the solution is designed to work with identity providers, offline mode functionality is limited, which might be a concern for systems that require constant availability.
  • Cost Considerations
    For small organizations or startups, the cost of implementing and maintaining an enterprise-level authentication system like Smallstep SSH might be prohibitive.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a learning curve associated with transitioning from traditional SSH management to Smallstep SSH's certificate-based approach, which might necessitate training for IT staff.

Analysis of sish

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Sish is considered a good choice for those looking for a straightforward tunneling solution, especially if they are familiar with SSH. It provides reliable service without the need for complex setups, making it a popular option among developers who prefer lightweight and open-source tools.

Why this product is good

  • Sish is a simple, open-source tool that allows users to serve local applications over the internet using SSH. It's appreciated for its ease of use, minimal configuration, and the ability to handle dynamic port forwarding, making it suitable for both individual developers and small teams seeking an alternative to Ngrok or similar services.

Recommended for

  • Developers who are familiar with SSH and want a simple way to expose their local applications.
  • Teams looking for a free and open-source alternative to paid tunneling services like Ngrok.
  • Individuals who need to quickly share a local application without involving complex configurations.
  • Developers working on side projects or prototypes who need a temporary way to test webhooks or collaborate over the internet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to sish and Smallstep SSH)

sish

Smallstep SSH

Localhost Tools
100 100%
Localhost Tools
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
0 0%
Identity And Access Management
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using sish and Smallstep SSH. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, sish seems to be a lot more popular than Smallstep SSH. While we know about 16 links to sish, we've tracked only 1 mention of Smallstep SSH. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

sish mentions (16)

View more

Smallstep SSH mentions (1)

  • SSH With SSO
    Through a combination of the properties that are in an SSH certificate and configuration on the hosts, you'll be able to realize RBAC. If you're using the open source step-ca, this will require you to configure things yourself on the hosts. We also have an offering where this capability and management/auditing of the rules is hosted for you, which makes that specific part easier: https://smallstep.com/sso-ssh/. Source: almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing sish and Smallstep SSH, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Keystash.io - Centralized Linux user and SSH key management software

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

BastionXP - BastionXP Identity Based Infrastructure Access Platform is a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) / Certificate Authority (CA) that creates, signs and distributes SSH, SSL X.509 certificates to servers and users upon successful SSO login via OAuth or SAML

localhost.run - Instantly share your localhost environment!

strongDM - Trust strongDM to manage an engineers access to everything

Loading...