Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Siberian CMS VS Google App Engine

Compare Siberian CMS VS Google App Engine and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Siberian CMS logo Siberian CMS

Siberian is an Open-Source and Free App Maker. Unlimited Push Notifications. Unlimited features. Fully Customizable. Download it and build your own app now!

Google App Engine logo Google App Engine

A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.
  • Siberian CMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • Google App Engine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-17

Siberian CMS features and specs

  • Open Source
    Siberian CMS is an open-source platform, which means users have the freedom to modify, distribute, and use the software without being locked into a proprietary system.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform offers a drag-and-drop interface, making it easier for users without extensive coding experience to build mobile apps.
  • Customizable
    Siberian CMS is highly customizable, allowing users to create unique and tailored mobile applications that suit specific needs or branding guidelines.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    The CMS supports the creation of apps for both iOS and Android platforms, offering greater reach and flexibility for businesses.
  • Community Support
    Being open source, the platform benefits from a community of developers and users who contribute plugins, themes, and support.

Possible disadvantages of Siberian CMS

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    While it offers a user-friendly interface, some technical knowledge and experience might be required for more advanced customization and features.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Compared to some proprietary systems, Siberian CMS may have fewer built-in features, necessitating the use of additional plugins or custom development.
  • Performance
    Depending on the complexity of the app and the server it’s hosted on, performance can sometimes be an issue, affecting load times and user experience.
  • Security Concerns
    Being open-source can sometimes expose the platform to security vulnerabilities if not properly managed and updated.
  • Dependency on Community and Third-Party Developers
    Reliance on community and third-party developers for plugins and updates can sometimes lead to inconsistencies in quality and support.

Google App Engine features and specs

  • Auto-scaling
    Google App Engine automatically scales your application based on the traffic it receives, ensuring that your application can handle varying workloads without manual intervention.
  • Managed environment
    App Engine provides a fully managed environment, covering infrastructure management tasks like server provisioning, patching, monitoring, and managing app versions.
  • Integrated services
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services such as Datastore, Cloud SQL, Pub/Sub, and more, offering a comprehensive ecosystem for building and deploying applications.
  • Multiple languages support
    Supports multiple programming languages including Java, Python, PHP, Node.js, Go, Ruby, and .NET, giving developers flexibility in choosing their preferred language.
  • Security
    Offers robust security features including Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Identity, and automated security updates, which help protect your applications from vulnerabilities.
  • Developer productivity
    App Engine allows rapid development and deployment, letting developers focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure management, thus boosting productivity.
  • Versioning
    Supports versioning of applications, allowing multiple versions of the application to be hosted simultaneously, which helps in A/B testing and rollback capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Google App Engine

  • Cost
    While you pay for what you use, costs can escalate quickly with high traffic or resource-intensive applications. Detailed cost prediction can be challenging.
  • Vendor lock-in
    Relying heavily on Google App Engine's proprietary services and APIs can make it difficult to migrate applications to other platforms, leading to vendor lock-in.
  • Limited control
    Being a fully managed service, App Engine provides limited control over the underlying infrastructure which might be a limitation for certain advanced use cases.
  • Environment constraints
    Certain restrictions and limitations are imposed on the runtime environment, such as request timeout limits and specific resource quotas, which can affect application performance.
  • Complex debugging
    Debugging issues in a highly abstracted managed environment can be more complex and difficult compared to traditional server-hosted applications.
  • Cold start latency
    Serverless environments like App Engine can suffer from cold start latency, where the initial request triggers a delay as the environment spins up resources.
  • Configuration complexity
    Despite its benefits, configuring and optimizing App Engine for specific scenarios can be more complex than expected, requiring a steep learning curve.

Siberian CMS videos

+ Add

Siberian CMS Review - A True Open Source App Maker

More videos:

  • Review - Siberian CMS - Mobile App Creator Software - Siberian CMS Review
  • Review - Customize Siberian CMS using CSS/style considering Awesomes customization as example

Google App Engine videos

+ Add

Get to know Google App Engine

More videos:

  • Review - Developing apps that scale automatically with Google App Engine

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Siberian CMS and Google App Engine)

Siberian CMS

Google App Engine

Mobile App Builder
100 100%
Mobile App Builder
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100
Mobile App Dev Platform
100 100%
Mobile App Dev Platform
0% 0
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
Cloud Hosting
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Siberian CMS and Google App Engine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Siberian CMS and Google App Engine

Siberian CMS Reviews

We have no reviews of Siberian CMS yet.
Be the first one to post

Google App Engine Reviews

Top 5 Alternatives to Heroku
Google App Engine is fast, easy, but not that very cheap. The pricing is reasonable, and it comes with a free tier, which is great for small projects that are right for beginner developers who want to quickly set up their apps. It can also auto scale, create new instances as needed and automatically handle high availability. App Engine gets a positive rating for performance...
Source: blog.back4app.com
AppScale - The Google App Engine Alternative
AppScale is open source Google App Engine and allows you to run your GAE applications on any infrastructure, anywhere that makes sense for your business. AppScale eliminates lock-in and makes your GAE application portable. This way you can choose which public or private cloud platform is the best fit for your business requirements. Because we are literally the GAE...
Source: blog.appscale.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google App Engine seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Siberian CMS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Siberian CMS yet. Tracking of Siberian CMS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Google App Engine mentions (31)

  • Guide to modern app-hosting without servers on Google Cloud
    If Google App Engine (GAE) is the "OG" serverless platform, Cloud Run (GCR) is its logical successor, crafted for today's modern app-hosting needs. GAE was the 1st generation of Google serverless platforms. It has since been joined, about a decade later, by 2nd generation services, GCR and Cloud Functions (GCF). GCF is somewhat out-of-scope for this post so I'll cover that another time. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Security in the Cloud: Your Role in the Shared Responsibility Model
    As Windsales Inc. expands, it adopts a PaaS model to offload server and runtime management, allowing its developers and engineers to focus on code development and deployment. By partnering with providers like Heroku and Google App Engine, Windsales Inc. Accesses a fully managed runtime environment. This choice relieves Windsales Inc. Of managing servers, OS updates, or runtime environment behavior. Instead,... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Hosting apps in the cloud with Google App Engine in 2024
    Google App Engine (GAE) is their original serverless solution and first cloud product, launching in 2008 (video), giving rise to Serverless 1.0 and the cloud computing platform-as-a-service (PaaS) service level. It didn't do function-hosting nor was the concept of containers mainstream yet. GAE was specifically for (web) app-hosting (but also supported mobile backends as well). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Fixing A Broken Deployment to Google App Engine
    In 2014, I took a web development on Udacity that was taught by Steve Huffman of Reddit fame. He taught authentication, salting passwords, the difference between GET and POST requests, basic html and css, caching techniques. It was a fantastic introduction to web dev. To pass the course, students deployed simple python servers to Google App Engine. When I started to look for work, I opted to use code from that... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Next.js Deployment: Vercel's Charm vs. GCP's Muscle
    GCP offers a comprehensive suite of cloud services, including Compute Engine, App Engine, and Cloud Run. This translates to unparalleled control over your infrastructure and deployment configurations. Designed for large-scale applications, GCP effortlessly scales to accommodate significant traffic growth. Additionally, for projects heavily reliant on Google services like BigQuery, Cloud Storage, or AI/ML tools,... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Siberian CMS and Google App Engine, you can also consider the following products

GoodBarber - GoodBarber is a mobile app creation platform.

Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.

Dropsource - Mobile development platform for building native iOS & Android apps

Dokku - Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash

Mobidonia - Native mobile app builder for iOS, Android & Apple Watch

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Loading...