SFML VS WADE

Compare SFML VS WADE and see what are their differences

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

SFML

SFML provides a simple interface to the various components of your PC, to ease the development of games and multimedia applications. It is composed of five modules: system, window, graphics, audio and network.

WADE

The easiest 2D and isometric HTML5 engine to make amazing web games and apps. Free and open source.

Landing page //
2018-09-29

Landing page //
2022-01-31

SFML

Website: sfml-dev.org
$ Details

Edit details

WADE

Website: clockworkchilli.com
$ Details: -

Edit details

SFML features and specs

User-Friendly API
SFML provides a simple and intuitive API which makes it easier for developers to learn and use, especially for beginners who are new to graphics programming.
Cross-Platform Support
SFML supports multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, allowing developers to create cross-platform applications with minimal code changes.
Module-Based
It offers different modules for handling various system aspects like graphics, window, audio, and networking. This modularity helps in organizing code better and using only what is needed.
Hardware Acceleration
SFML provides hardware-accelerated graphics, making it efficient and fast for rendering, which is critical for real-time applications like games.
Community and Documentation
SFML has an active community and offers comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and a supportive forum which are invaluable for development and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of SFML

Limited 3D Support
SFML is primarily designed for 2D graphics, and it doesn’t have native support for 3D graphics, which can be limiting for developers looking to create 3D games.
Less Popularity
Compared to other game development libraries and frameworks like Unity or Unreal Engine, SFML is less popular, which means fewer third-party resources and plugins.
Manual Memory Management
SFML does not handle memory management for you, requiring developers to be cautious with resource management to avoid memory leaks.
Limited Advanced Features
While SFML covers basic game development needs, it may lack advanced features and tools provided by more extensive engines, leading developers to implement more functionalities manually.
Smaller Ecosystem
The ecosystem around SFML is smaller compared to more mature game engines, which leads to fewer tutorials, plugins, and reusable assets available for developers.

WADE features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

SFML videos

+ Add

Coding a Simple SFML Game Framework in C++/ SFML

WADE videos

+ Add

Li-Ning Wow 9 Infinity Performance Review! Dwyane Wade Way of Wade 9!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SFML and WADE)

SFML

WADE

Game Engine

79 79%

Game Engine

21% 21

Game Development

83 83%

Game Development

17% 17

Tool

0 0%

Tool

100% 100

3D Game Engine

100 100%

3D Game Engine

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SFML and WADE. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SFML seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SFML mentions (1)

Open source recreation of the PS Vita game -- Calling all creators
I would like to recreate the Plastic Memories PS Vita game as a free, open source, cross-platform (any platform SFML runs on*) game for everyone to enjoy. I'm not sure how much time I'll be able to put into it (I don't have much time between school and various other projects of mine) but I can handle the code, coordination, and source code hosting. Source: over 3 years ago