Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Servers Alive VS NetCrunch

Compare Servers Alive VS NetCrunch and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Servers Alive logo Servers Alive

Servers Alive is an end-to-end network monitoring tool running on Windows 2003/2008/XP/Vista/7.

NetCrunch logo NetCrunch

NetCrunch IT Monitoring Platform is easy to start and enterprise scalable. It allows monitoring of systems, logs, applications, cloud and SNMP devices.
  • Servers Alive Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-25
  • NetCrunch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-22

Servers Alive features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

NetCrunch features and specs

  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    NetCrunch provides extensive monitoring capabilities for a wide array of network devices, systems, and services, ensuring thorough visibility into network performance.
  • Agentless Monitoring
    The platform operates without the need for software agents on the monitored devices, simplifying setup and reducing resource consumption on the endpoints.
  • Customizable Dashboards
    Users can create tailored dashboards that display the most relevant data and metrics for their specific monitoring needs, enhancing usability and efficiency.
  • Real-time Alerts
    NetCrunch offers real-time alerting with customizable thresholds and notifications, allowing for quick responses to potential network issues.
  • Automated Network Discovery
    The tool automatically discovers and maps network elements, saving time and effort in setting up and maintaining an accurate network inventory.

Possible disadvantages of NetCrunch

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive feature set may be overwhelming for new users who might find it challenging to navigate and utilize the software effectively without proper guidance.
  • Cost
    NetCrunch can be relatively expensive, particularly for smaller organizations or those with limited IT budgets, which may hinder accessibility.
  • Limited Integration
    While NetCrunch supports a range of integrations, it might not offer direct compatibility with all third-party systems, requiring additional configuration efforts.
  • Resource Intensive
    The software might demand significant system resources for large-scale monitoring, affecting performance in environments with limited hardware capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its breadth of functionality, mastering NetCrunch may require a substantial learning curve, particularly for users unfamiliar with advanced network monitoring tools.

Servers Alive videos

No Servers Alive videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

NetCrunch videos

+ Add

NetCrunch Performance Monitor

More videos:

  • Review - What makes NetCrunch network monitoring system unique?
  • Review - Getting Started with NetCrunch

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Servers Alive and NetCrunch)

Servers Alive

NetCrunch

Monitoring Tools
23 23%
Monitoring Tools
77% 77
Performance Monitoring
32 32%
Performance Monitoring
68% 68
Log Management
24 24%
Log Management
76% 76
Network Monitoring
100 100%
Network Monitoring
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Servers Alive and NetCrunch. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Servers Alive and NetCrunch

Servers Alive Reviews

We have no reviews of Servers Alive yet.
Be the first one to post

NetCrunch Reviews

  1. Danielle99palmer
    · Information Security Analyst at Net-Solution Inc ·
    A very good software to monitor all our IT infrastructure.

    I like how compatible it is with the different operating systems that exist, the monitoring of our network is very good, it is intuitive, it identifies vulnerabilities in the different devices connected to our network, the detection is very fast, it is a system that facilitates the detection of problems in our network.

    👍 Pros:    Accurate monitoring and easy configuration.|It has intuitive navigation and detailed features.|Very competitive price.
    👎 Cons:    No problem, the troubleshooting capabilities on our network are very good.
11 Best Nagios Alternatives (Free & Open Source) in 2024
Other features: NetCrunch offers policy-based configuration, SNMP traps and notifications, and Full SNMPV3 support. It can also monitor custom network services and the cloud.
Source: www.guru99.com
Alternatives to Nmap: from simple to advanced network scanning
NetCrunch has four scanning tools: Network Service Scanner scans for 70 known services (such as TCP, TLS andUDP) running on computers and other devices on a network. Open Port Scanner scans for open ports, based on a list of known ports or within a range you set. Ping Scanner can scan a range of IP addresses and perform DNS lookups. SNMP Scanner extracts basic information...
Source: www.networkworld.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Servers Alive and NetCrunch, you can also consider the following products

Zabbix - Track, record, alert and visualize performance and availability of IT resources

Paessler PRTG - An advanced network monitoring solution to monitor network up/downtime, traffic and usage.

Datadog - See metrics from all of your apps, tools & services in one place with Datadog's cloud monitoring as a service solution. Try it for free.

Observium - Observium

NetVizura NetFlow Analyzer - NetFlow Analyzer is a solution for bandwidth monitoring and traffic analysis. It helps with traffic investigation, analysis and reporting

Pingdom - With website monitoring from Pingdom you will be the first to know when your website is down. No installation required. 30-day free trial.

Loading...