Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Serv-U FTP Server VS SFTPGo

Compare Serv-U FTP Server VS SFTPGo and see what are their differences

Serv-U FTP Server logo Serv-U FTP Server

FTP server software

SFTPGo logo SFTPGo

Fully featured and highly configurable SFTP server with optional HTTP/S, FTP/S and WebDAV support - S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob
  • Serv-U FTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-25
  • SFTPGo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-22

Serv-U FTP Server features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Serv-U FTP Server provides a user-friendly interface, making it easy for administrators to manage FTP services without extensive technical knowledge.
  • Customizable Security Features
    It offers robust security options including IP whitelisting and blacklisting, SSL/TLS encryption, and password policies to ensure data protection during file transfers.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Available for Windows and Linux operating systems, Serv-U provides flexibility for organizations using different server environments.
  • Web-Based Management
    The web-based management console allows administrators to access and manage the server from any device with an internet connection.
  • Automation Capabilities
    Advanced automation features enable scheduled tasks and centralized management of file transfers, enhancing operational efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of Serv-U FTP Server

  • Cost
    Serv-U FTP Server is a commercial product, and its licensing fees may be prohibitive for smaller businesses or organizations looking for a low-cost or free solution.
  • Complexity for Large Scale Deployments
    While user-friendly for smaller setups, it may become complex when scaled up, requiring more advanced expertise to manage and configure efficiently.
  • Limited Integrations
    Compared to some competitors, Serv-U FTP may have fewer integrations with third-party applications and services, potentially limiting its adaptability.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report that Serv-U can experience performance bottlenecks or slowdowns, particularly under heavy use or when handling large files.
  • Support Limitations
    Support services might not be as comprehensive or promptly available as some users seek, potentially leading to extended resolution times for technical issues.

SFTPGo features and specs

  • Security
    SFTPGo provides secure file transfer capabilities by supporting SFTP, FTP/S, and WebDAV protocols, which are well-known for their ability to facilitate encrypted data exchange.
  • Flexibility
    It offers a range of storage backends, including local filesystem, S3-compatible storage, and Google Cloud Storage, allowing users to integrate it with various storage solutions.
  • User Management
    SFTPGo comes with a rich set of user management features, such as virtual folders, per-user permissions, and fine-grained controls over access and bandwidth, simplifying administration tasks.
  • Event-driven Automation
    The software supports event-driven task automation and notification through hooks and triggers, providing customization for workflows and system integration.
  • Web-based Interface
    SFTPGo includes a web-based management interface, which allows administrators to manage users, monitor activity, and configure the server without requiring command-line expertise.

Possible disadvantages of SFTPGo

  • Complexity of Configuration
    Due to its extensive configuration options and features, beginners might find the setup process complex and require time to fully understand and implement all functionalities.
  • Performance Overhead
    For deployments that do not require extensive security features, the overhead associated with encrypted protocols and additional settings might affect performance.
  • Community Support
    As an open-source project, while it has an active community, users might not have access to the same level of dedicated support compared to commercial alternatives.
  • Documentation Depth
    Although documentation is available, some users may find it lacking in detail for advanced configurations, requiring additional time for experimentation and community engagement.
  • Resource Use
    Depending on the scale of deployment and usage, SFTPGo may be resource-intensive, requiring careful planning to ensure hardware and associated infrastructure can handle the load efficiently.

Serv-U FTP Server videos

No Serv-U FTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SFTPGo videos

SSHFS and SFTPGo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Serv-U FTP Server and SFTPGo)
File Transfer
57 57%
43% 43
FTP Client
52 52%
48% 48
SSH
57 57%
43% 43
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Serv-U FTP Server and SFTPGo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SFTPGo seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Serv-U FTP Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Serv-U FTP Server yet. Tracking of Serv-U FTP Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

SFTPGo mentions (21)

  • What you guys are hosting instead of Nextcloud? I'm sick of it.
    EDIT: Thanks for the recommendations from all of you!! I've chose to use the below: - Files: sftpgo - Calendar: baikal - Notes: memos (But beware, it sends opt-out telemetry) - Network folder: webdav on sftpgo. Source: over 1 year ago
  • HashiCorp Did It Backwards
    > Even these projects have gotten to a level of sophistication that it would implode without big tech support. The worst thing is that all this FAANG or VC backed companies make a lot of people believe that they are the only viable way. > Why do you think you don't see any interesting oss tech from hobbyists is these days? Actually not true, just an example, - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Running an FTP server WITHOUT admin priveleges
    This is possible using SFTPGo. The default Windows installer register SFTPGo as a Windows service. You can download the portable version and run it manually or install SFTPGo from the Scoop packages. You can use the built-in SFTPGo virtual permissions to only allow uploads. SFTPGo uses virtual users, no system users are required. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Was the move to AES 256 really necessary?
    Basically it's a file storage managed over HTTPS. Nextcloud is pretty heavy, that's the reason why I using just a single statically compiled cross-platform binary SFTPgo. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Simple read only ftp server
    Using SFTPGo you can easily configure read-only accounts. SFTPGo uses virtual users and virtual permissions. So you don't need to create system users for your SFTPGo users and you don't need to use chmod to make folders read-only (but the system user that SFTPGo runs as needs file system level permission to access the files/folders you want to share). Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Serv-U FTP Server and SFTPGo, you can also consider the following products

FileZilla Server - Download FileZilla Server 0.9.60.2 for Windows

vsftpd - Very secure FTP Daemon, a secure, fast FTP server for UNIX systems, including Linux.

ProFTPD - The Official ProFTPD web site. ProFTPD is a high-performance, extremely configurable, and most of all a secure FTP server, featuring Apache-like configuration and blazing performance.

Titan FTP Server - Windows FTP Server with SFTP and SSL. Includes events automation, host key support, and strong security.

Baby FTP Server - The simplest FTP server to setup. No authentication required.

Xlight FTP Server - Xlight FTP Server is a high performance and easy to use ftp server software for Windows.