> Not sure I understand your point. The problem is using Treesitter (for syntax highlighting and "semantic movements") and an LSP at the same time. So if your language has a LSP, using Treesitter additionally is redundant at best and introduces inconcistency at worst. I'm not talking about using Treesitter as the parser for the LSP. > Most popular languages have language-specific tools I'd say even less popular... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

This project is a compilation of Semgrep rules derived from the OWASP Mobile Application Security Testing Guide (MASTG) specifically for Android applications. The aim is to enhance and support Mobile Application Penetration Testing (MAPT) activities conducted by the ethical hacker community. The primary objective of these rules is to address the static tests outlined in the OWASP MASTG. Source: 11 months ago

For generally code analysis, I used Semgrep in the past. Source: over 1 year ago

You can try with Semgrep. For scanning shared drive you need to have the access though. Source: over 1 year ago

For these cases, let me introduce you to my favorite static code analysis tool: semgrep. It's a free Open Source tool that you can install and use right now (it only starts costing money if you want to use their dashboard to view the results, which is entirely optional, and all code scanning runs on your device - code is never uploaded to any servers). As stated briefly, semgrep searches for code matching specific... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Coveralls.io — Display test coverage reports, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Several years ago I got into Travis CI and set up lots of my GitHub repos so they automatically ran the tests each time I committed to the repo. Later on, I also worked out how to tie those test runs into Coveralls.io so I got pretty graphs of how my test coverage was looking. I gave a talk about what I had done. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago