SecureDrop VS Molly (Signal fork)

TOR browser and checkout https://securedrop.org/. Source: 12 months ago

How is it similar or different from secure drop? https://securedrop.org/. Source: about 1 year ago

It depends if you are a freelancer, small time or international journalist. Or what you define as a journalist. Most organizations use SecureDrop. https://securedrop.org. Source: over 1 year ago

Securedrop can be used to anonymously communicate with many news organizations if you would like. Source: over 1 year ago

If you're a journalist, then https://securedrop.org/. For messaging, if you don't want to share a phone number with Signal, which I do NOT suspect of sockpuppetry (it's been autited!) then do your research and coordinate with your source https://www.privacyguides.org/real-time-communication/. Source: almost 2 years ago

Check out https://molly.im/. It's a hardened Signal fork with one version stripping the google dependencies out of it. Push notifications work flawlessly even with battery optimization enabled. Source: about 1 year ago

The one benefit is that we now have no reason NOT to use Molly (the hardened version of Signal). Previously I didn't just because of sms. https://molly.im/. Source: about 1 year ago

Hi, you can add the repository in fdroid of a fork of signal, Molly Molly , you have a FOSS version. Source: about 1 year ago

Signal uses Curve25519, AES-256, and HMAC-SHA256 for its e2e encryption. So unless you believe those algorithms are insecure, there's no reason to think that their server setup is a compromise on your messages' security. Fear of "future decryption" applies equally to all forms of encrypted communication, regardless of which servers the messages go through. And since AES-256 is known to resist quantum computing... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

I don't know if they are technically allowed but https://molly.im exists. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago