SearXNG VS Gab

Privacy-focused metasearch engines, like SearXNG[1] and 4get[2], should be considered more comprehensive and private than any one index or engine. [1]https://docs.searxng.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Recently I came across SearXNG, it's a privacy respecting search engine Aggregator. Amazing tool. Worth checking : https://docs.searxng.org. Source: 5 months ago

I have switched over to using DuckDuckGo as my main search engine, but I may set up SearNGX behind a VPN in the future. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

The more you rely on ChatGPT, the less you'll be able to think for yourself. For searching I use Presearch and SearxNG. It's your mind. Be careful what you feed it. :). Source: about 1 year ago

Lots of selfhosters run SearxNG & its documentation is really well established with a good API to interact with out of the box. I just love the results from a dozen or so different engines which makes it really easy to filter out the "SEO hackers" that have ruined search for almost every common keyword. Source: about 1 year ago

If you want uncensored.. https://gab.ai. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

I don't understand how you can stop spam yet not have the structures in place to censor forbidden views or opinions. Without admin moderation you get 50 million flavours of porn (like old Usenet servers) some of which will be illegal porn, a massive slice of QAnon and conspiracy (like Odyssee and gab.ai), information and propaganda useful to terrorists (like the old totse.com) and dark web drug markets. Source: about 2 years ago

This already exists in the "Dissenter browser" made by the folks over at gab.ai. This could work as a third party extension, but direct support from Brave would instantly draw controversy as it's perceived that the only reason Dissenter exists is to support toxic radical right wingers. Source: over 2 years ago

I feel that there is still space for a platform for content creators which is away from any restrictions. I was talking to a lawyer friend of mine about drafting a user agreement which makes it impossible for anyone to sue any content creator or the platform, or for any government or group to force removal of content. but in the end we figured that we would need a back to back agreement with our service... Source: almost 3 years ago