Sculptura VS Apple ARKit

I have :). First I did UI work with Qt at Pixar on the animation tools. Then I wrote a couple apps (http://audulus.com mostly custom, https://sculptura.app mostly SwiftUI, ongoing of course). Now I'm working on a Rust UI library: https://github.com/audulus/rui. Source: almost 2 years ago

Ok I'm not Raph but, FWIW, my 3d sculpting app is written using SwiftUI (https://sculptura.app), which is not a view around a database (in fact it was previously UIKit... SwiftUI is so much better). I recently implemented a piano-roll editor in SwiftUI: https://github.com/AudioKit/AudioKitUI/tree/main/Sources/AudioKitUI/Controls/PianoRoll. I have little doubt a DAW could be implemented in SwiftUI easier than with... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Apple has quite nice page with docs at the bottom: https://developer.apple.com/augmented-reality/. Source: 11 months ago

Feels like you're grasping at straws to dismiss them. If you think lower weight, not-grainy MR, six years of a public AR SDK, far better computing units, and an existing high-quality software ecosystem are "not noticeable", I'm left wondering what you think is noticeable. Source: 12 months ago

If you're looking to build a more advanced application, there are plenty of useful resources for all major technologies. For mobile apps, the best places to get started are docs for Google ARCore and Apple ARKit. Both platforms work with popular gaming engines like Unity and Unreal Engine. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

ARKit is Apple's (A)ugmented (R)eality development (K)it. It takes the output from Unity and displays it in the goggles/headset the guy is wearing to see all this. Well, what a camera pointed at the display sees. Source: over 2 years ago

Google and Apple have already released their augmented reality development platforms, ARCore or ARKit, enabling the seamless integration of the digital and physical worlds. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago