Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Screenfetch VS CPU Frequency Selector

Compare Screenfetch VS CPU Frequency Selector and see what are their differences

Screenfetch logo Screenfetch

Simple command-line tool that displays your distro's logo in text art form, your OS version...

CPU Frequency Selector logo CPU Frequency Selector

Cinnamon CPU Frequency Selector Applet
  • Screenfetch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • CPU Frequency Selector Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

Screenfetch features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Support
    Screenfetch supports multiple operating systems like Linux, macOS, and some Unix-based systems, making it versatile for users on different platforms.
  • Customizable Appearance
    Users can easily customize the output appearance, including the choice of ASCII art for different distributions, allowing for personalization.
  • Lightweight and Fast
    Screenfetch is a lightweight script requiring minimal resources and provides quick system information, which is useful for users with low-performance hardware.
  • Easy to Use
    Screenfetch is simple to install and use, appreciated by both beginners and advanced users for quickly displaying system information with minimal effort.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source and hosted on GitHub, Screenfetch benefits from a community of contributors and users who can provide support, report issues, and extend its functionality.

Possible disadvantages of Screenfetch

  • Limited to Terminal Output
    Screenfetch primarily operates within the terminal, which may not appeal to users looking for a graphical user interface or applications that run outside of the command line.
  • Non-Comprehensive Information
    While Screenfetch displays basic system details, it lacks comprehensive information compared to more robust system monitoring tools, limiting its utility for advanced diagnostics.
  • ASCII Art Size Limitations
    The ASCII art and information display might not scale well on terminals with different sizes or resolutions, potentially leading to suboptimal presentation.
  • Dependence on System Packages
    Screenfetch may rely on or interact with other system packages to fetch information, leading to potential conflicts or errors if dependencies aren't met.
  • Configuration and Scripting Knowledge
    Although easy to use, users may require knowledge of scripting and configuration files for advanced customizations or troubleshooting.

CPU Frequency Selector features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The Cinnamon CPU Frequency Selector applet provides a user-friendly interface for managing CPU frequency, making it accessible for users who prefer a GUI over command-line tools.
  • Fine-Grained Control
    It allows users to manually set the CPU frequency or choose between different governors, giving fine-grained control over performance and power consumption.
  • Integration with Cinnamon
    The applet integrates seamlessly with the Cinnamon desktop environment, offering a consistent user experience and an aesthetic that's familiar to Cinnamon users.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, the applet is free to use, and users can modify it to fit their needs or contribute to its development.
  • Real-Time Information
    Users can view real-time information about CPU frequency and governor status directly from the applet, helping them make informed decisions about their CPU's performance.

Possible disadvantages of CPU Frequency Selector

  • Limited to Cinnamon
    The applet is specifically designed for the Cinnamon desktop environment, which limits its usability for those using other desktop environments.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    As with any software that alters system settings, there is a potential risk of stability issues or system crashes if not used properly.
  • Dependency on System Compatibility
    The effectiveness and functionality of the applet can depend on the compatibility of the underlying hardware and kernel with CPU frequency scaling.
  • Learning Curve for New Users
    Users unfamiliar with CPU frequency scaling and governors might face a learning curve in understanding how to optimally use the applet.
  • Possible Overhead
    While generally lightweight, running additional applets can add a slight overhead to system resources, which might be a consideration for users on low-resource systems.

Screenfetch videos

Neofetch vs. Screenfetch - What's the Difference?

More videos:

  • Review - You don't need Screenfetch - A little Hex Ramble (Linux)
  • Review - debinfo My personal Screenfetch

CPU Frequency Selector videos

No CPU Frequency Selector videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Screenfetch and CPU Frequency Selector)
Monitoring Tools
43 43%
57% 57
Device Management
52 52%
48% 48
Log Management
55 55%
45% 45
System Information
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Screenfetch and CPU Frequency Selector. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Screenfetch and CPU Frequency Selector, you can also consider the following products

Neofetch - Fancier version of Screenfetch that displays colors and supports more platforms.

Udev Discover - A helping tool for udev testers, coders, hackers and consumers.

Archey 4 - Archey 4 is a system information tool written in Python

PC Wizard - THIS SOFTWARE IS NO LONGER MAINTAINED.PC-Wizard is an utility designed to analyze and benchmark your computer system. CPU and memory subsystem (caches, RAM ...). Graphics and video. Hard disks, CD/DVD, Removable/FLASH medias.

Freshfetch - A fresh take on neofetch

HeavyLoad - The individual test methods employed by HeavyLoad can be customized to fit your needs.