Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Scott Murray Tutorials VS User Interviews

Compare Scott Murray Tutorials VS User Interviews and see what are their differences

UserGuiding
Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Scott Murray Tutorials logo Scott Murray Tutorials

Design, data, visualization, culture.

User Interviews logo User Interviews

User Interviews is a tool to recruit participants for product tests and market research.
  • Scott Murray Tutorials Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-02
  • User Interviews Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-30

Scott Murray Tutorials features and specs

  • Comprehensive Content
    The tutorials cover a wide range of topics on D3.js, from basic to advanced features, providing a thorough understanding of data visualization techniques using D3.
  • Step-by-Step Instructions
    Each tutorial includes clear, step-by-step instructions that make it easier for beginners to follow along and understand the complex concepts involved in D3.js.
  • Practical Examples
    The tutorials include practical examples and use cases that help learners apply what they have learned to real-world scenarios, enhancing their learning experience.
  • Updated Material
    The tutorials are regularly updated to reflect the latest version of D3.js, ensuring that users are learning the most current methods and practices.

Possible disadvantages of Scott Murray Tutorials

  • Steep Learning Curve
    D3.js itself has a steep learning curve, and although the tutorials are well-written, some users may still find the material challenging without a solid background in JavaScript and data visualization.
  • Limited Interactivity
    Some tutorials might lack interactivity, which can make it harder for learners to test their understanding by trying out examples and experimenting with the code.
  • Assumed Knowledge
    The tutorials assume a certain level of prior knowledge in JavaScript and web development, which may not be suitable for complete beginners who lack programming experience.

User Interviews features and specs

  • Large Participant Pool
    User Interviews offers access to a diverse and extensive participant pool, making it easier to find suitable candidates for research.
  • Simplified Recruitment Process
    The platform streamlines the recruitment process, helping researchers save time and reduce the administrative burden associated with finding and scheduling participants.
  • Variable Incentives Management
    User Interviews allows researchers to manage different types of incentives (e.g., cash, gift cards) to attract participants, offering flexibility and reducing overhead.
  • Advanced Filtering Options
    The platform provides advanced filtering options to help researchers narrow down candidates by demographics, professional background, and more, ensuring the right participants are selected.
  • Automated Scheduling
    User Interviews features automated scheduling tools, which synchronize with calendars and communicate with participants, reducing the complexity of arranging meetings.

Possible disadvantages of User Interviews

  • Cost
    User Interviews can be relatively expensive, especially for smaller teams or solo researchers, which may be a barrier to entry for some users.
  • Platform Learning Curve
    New users or those unfamiliar with the platform may face a learning curve when navigating and utilizing all the features offered by User Interviews.
  • Participant Availability
    Despite the large participant pool, there can be cases where specific participant criteria are challenging to meet, potentially delaying the research process.
  • Service Limitations
    The platform may not offer all the specific types of user research needed (e.g., longitudinal studies, in-person focus groups), which can limit its applicability for certain projects.
  • Dependence on Internet Stability
    The effectiveness of online interviews and the platform itself is highly dependent on internet stability, which may pose issues in locations with poor internet connectivity.

Analysis of User Interviews

Overall verdict

  • User Interviews is generally considered a good choice for those looking to recruit participants for user research. Its comprehensive features, reliable support, and positive user reviews make it a recommended tool in the market. While some users have noted that pricing can be a factor to consider, the overall value provided by its robust toolset and participant pool make it a worthwhile investment.

Why this product is good

  • User Interviews is a popular platform for user research and participant recruitment. It is praised for its ease of use, extensive participant database, and efficient recruitment process. Researchers benefit from its intuitive interface and the ability to quickly find diverse and high-quality participants for studies across various demographics. Additionally, the platform offers integration with popular research tools and provides robust support, making it a versatile choice for both academic and commercial research projects.

Recommended for

  • User experience researchers needing to conduct remote or in-person studies.
  • Product teams looking to gain insights into user behavior and preferences.
  • Market researchers who require access to a wide array of demographics.
  • Entrepreneurs and startups aiming to test product concepts and usability features.

Scott Murray Tutorials videos

No Scott Murray Tutorials videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

User Interviews videos

+ Add

User Interviews Review: A Legit Way to Make $50-200 an Hour for Your Opinion?

More videos:

  • Review - User Interviews: 5 Tips & Tricks For UX Researchers
  • Review - User Interviews Done Right

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Scott Murray Tutorials and User Interviews)

Scott Murray Tutorials

User Interviews

Education
100 100%
Education
0% 0
User Experience
0 0%
User Experience
100% 100
Tutorials
100 100%
Tutorials
0% 0
UX Research
0 0%
UX Research
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Scott Murray Tutorials and User Interviews. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, User Interviews seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Scott Murray Tutorials mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Scott Murray Tutorials yet. Tracking of Scott Murray Tutorials recommendations started around Mar 2021.

User Interviews mentions (17)

  • I need local playtesters for tabletop games [DFW]
    If you have a bit more budget, you can also recruit participants from online panels (like userinterviews.com or respondent.io). For an incentive, you can screen the right people to participate in your playtest. Keep in mind you will need to do some vetting and make sure you're not getting "professional" participants. Source: about 2 years ago
  • B2b user testing
    I used userinterviews.com recently for a really specific type of targeted user and was impressed with their ability to get folks. It isn't cheap, and I don't know if it would work in other cases, but I would suggest checking it out. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Where do you guys get user testers for a reasonable fee?
    Userinterviews.com is where we typically go, but it's still costly (~75 per participant, depending on recruiting needs). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Thoughts on userinterviews.com?
    Hey! Does anyone have experience with userinterviews.com for getting feedback? Wondering if the price is worth it for validating my idea and talking with users who fit my target profile. Are there any other good options? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Can users themselves fill out empathy maps, problem statements, personas, etc?
    PMs constantly pay people to do interviews with them, via usertesting.com, userinterviews.com, etc. Not sure if I'm missing something here. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Scott Murray Tutorials and User Interviews, you can also consider the following products

D3 Tips and Tricks - Interactive Data Visualization in a Web Browser

UserTesting.com - Usability testing has never been easier. Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use websites, mobile apps, prototypes and more!

D3 Gallery - Mike Bostocks D3 examples

Respondent - Respondent helps you find any target audience in the world for in-person and remote research studies across all research methods including interviews, focus groups, surveys, and more. Respondent works with any research tool you already use.

Hackr.io - There are tons of online programming courses and tutorials, but it's never easy to find the best one. Try Hackr.io to find the best online courses submitted & voted by the programming community.

Hotjar - The #1 Leader in Heatmaps, Recordings, Surveys & More. Sign up for a 15-day free trial and start learning from real user behavior today!

Loading...