Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
BV

Scalpel VS Bytecode Viewer

Compare Scalpel VS Bytecode Viewer and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Scalpel logo Scalpel

Scalpel-2.0 - Scalpel; File Carving. Configuration files are modified.

Bytecode Viewer logo Bytecode Viewer

A Java 8 Jar & Android APK Reverse Engineering Suite (Decompiler, Editor, Debugger & More)
  • Scalpel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21
Not present

Scalpel features and specs

  • Open Source
    Scalpel is open-source software, allowing users to modify and improve the code as needed. This fosters community collaboration and continuous improvement.
  • Lightweight
    The program is lightweight, making it efficient not only in terms of resource usage but also in terms of speed, particularly suitable for tasks involving file carving.
  • Cross-Platform
    Scalpel is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Linux and Windows, providing flexibility to users on different platforms.
  • Extensible
    Users can edit the configuration files to add support for additional file types, offering a high degree of customization for forensic analyses.
  • Targeted File Recovery
    Scalpel allows for precise recovery of specific file types by using header and footer records defined in its configuration, enhancing the focus and efficiency of data recovery processes.

Possible disadvantages of Scalpel

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and customizing Scalpel requires editing configuration files, which can be complex and intimidating for users without technical background or experience in digital forensics.
  • Command-Line Interface
    The tool operates through a command-line interface, which could be less user-friendly for people accustomed to graphical interfaces, potentially steepening the learning curve.
  • Limited Built-in File Type Support
    By default, Scalpel may only support a limited set of file types; users must manually configure new definitions to carve other file types, requiring additional effort and expertise.
  • Lack of Active Development
    Scalpel does not receive frequent updates or active development, which may lead to challenges in dealing with new file systems or specific bugs that arise over time.
  • No Graphical User Interface
    The lack of a graphical user interface (GUI) may hinder ease of use and accessibility for non-technical users or those preferring a more visual interaction with software.

Bytecode Viewer features and specs

  • Comprehensive Toolset
    Bytecode Viewer offers an integrated suite of tools including a decompiler, disassembler, debugger, and analytics tool, which allows for a thorough inspection and analysis of Java bytecode within a single application.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool is designed with an intuitive and user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of navigating and analyzing bytecode, even for users who may not have extensive experience in reverse engineering.
  • Multiple Decompiler Engines
    Bytecode Viewer supports multiple decompiler engines like CFR, Fernflower, Procyon, and others, allowing users to choose the best-suited one for their specific needs and preferences.
  • Cross-Platform
    The application is built to run on multiple platforms, including Windows, MacOS, and Linux, due to its Java-based nature, ensuring accessibility for users on different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source software, Bytecode Viewer allows users to contribute to its development, customize features, and inspect the source code to more deeply understand its workings.

Possible disadvantages of Bytecode Viewer

  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, particularly with large files or projects, which can lead to slower analysis and increased resource usage.
  • Limited Support for Other Languages
    While Bytecode Viewer excels with Java and Android bytecode, it doesn't support other programming languages, which might limit its utility for developers working in diverse environments.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the complex nature of bytecode and reverse engineering might overwhelm beginners without enough support or guidance within the tool itself.
  • Dependency on Java Environment
    Since Bytecode Viewer is Java-based, it requires a Java Runtime Environment to be installed and configured correctly, which might add an extra step for users who do not have Java set up.
  • Occasional Bugs
    As with many open-source projects, Bytecode Viewer can sometimes have bugs that might affect its stability or functionality, depending on its version and the system it's run on.

Scalpel videos

+ Add

Cannondale Scalpel-Si Team - Long Term Review

More videos:

  • Review - Cannondale Scalpel SI Review – 2017 Bible of Bike Tests
  • Review - CANNONDALE SCALPEL SI REVIEW - ALL RIDE EP58

Bytecode Viewer videos

+ Add

Bytecode Viewer Beta 1.5.3

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Scalpel and Bytecode Viewer)

Scalpel

Bytecode Viewer

Backup & Restore
100 100%
Backup & Restore
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
IDE
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Scalpel and Bytecode Viewer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bytecode Viewer should be more popular than Scalpel. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Scalpel mentions (1)

  • does formating your pc erase your Bitcoin wallet?
    Probably more than $100 of work, but if you're really serious https://github.com/sleuthkit/scalpel. Source: over 2 years ago

Bytecode Viewer mentions (2)

  • CandyPixel - Known Information Wanted Please.
    If you do use this plugin I'd recommend also using https://bytecodeviewer.com/ to check the supposed malicious lines of code. Source: over 3 years ago
  • A response from r/AskReddit. Are we even surprised?
    Take a look at tools like this one to get an idea of what you can actually get: https://bytecodeviewer.com/. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Scalpel and Bytecode Viewer, you can also consider the following products

TestDisk - TestDisk is a free and open source data recovery software tool designed to recover lost partition and unerase deleted files. DownloadDownload TestDisk & PhotoRec. TestDisk is a free and open .

JADX - JADX is a decompilation tool that can produce Java Source code from Dex and Apk files, being capable of providing human-readable java classes, it reverses AndroidManifest.

PhotoRec - Jun 4, 2016 - PhotoRec is file data recovery software designed to recover lost files including video, documents and archives from hard disks, CD-ROMs, and lost pictures (thus the Photo Recovery name) from digital camera memory.

APK Editor Studio - APK Editor Studio is an open-source Android application editor that allows you to edit APKs with the help of reverse engineering.

Foremost - Foremost is a console program to recover files based on their headers, footers, and internal data...

APK Studio - APK Studio is an open-source Integrated Development Environment that allows you to recompile and decompile Android applications with its unified interface.

Loading...