Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SBT VS rollup.js

Compare SBT VS rollup.js and see what are their differences

SBT logo SBT

SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

rollup.js logo rollup.js

Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.
  • SBT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • rollup.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-09

SBT features and specs

  • Incremental Compilation
    SBT offers incremental compilation, which only recompiles the parts of your code that have changed, leading to faster build times and increased productivity.
  • Interactive Shell
    SBT provides an interactive shell that allows developers to run tasks, tests, and compile code without leaving the environment, improving the workflow and convenience.
  • Built-In Dependency Management
    SBT integrates seamlessly with Ivy for dependency management, making it easy to define, manage, and retrieve project dependencies efficiently.
  • Scala-Specific
    SBT is specifically designed for Scala projects, offering tailored features and optimizations that align well with Scala programming paradigms and best practices.
  • Highly Customizable
    With a powerful plugin ecosystem and the ability to define custom tasks, SBT is highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the build process to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of SBT

  • Complexity
    SBT can be difficult to learn for new Scala developers due to its unique syntax and extensive configuration options, potentially leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Performance Overheads
    While SBT provides incremental compilation, it may still have performance overheads in large projects or when many plugins are used, affecting build times.
  • Limited Ecosystem Outside Scala
    Since SBT is specifically tailored for Scala, its ecosystem and community support may be more limited for projects that involve languages other than Scala.
  • Less Popular Than Some Alternatives
    Compared to build tools like Maven or Gradle, SBT has a smaller user base, which can result in fewer resources, forums, and community support for troubleshooting.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    The configuration language of SBT may be challenging to debug, particularly for users unfamiliar with its syntax, leading to potential difficulties in resolving issues.

rollup.js features and specs

  • Tree Shaking
    Rollup.js performs treeshaking to eliminate dead code, resulting in smaller bundle sizes. It analyzes the dependency tree and includes only the parts of the code that are actually used.
  • Output Formats
    Supports multiple output formats including ES modules, CommonJS, AMD, UMD, and IIFE. This makes it versatile for different use cases.
  • Plugins
    Rollup.js has a rich ecosystem of plugins that extend its functionality, such as code transformation, minification, and support for various types of modules.
  • Code Splitting
    Supports code splitting, allowing you to break your code into smaller chunks that can be loaded on demand. This improves performance for larger projects.
  • Efficient Bundling
    Offers efficient bundling by removing duplicates and ensuring that each module gets included only once, which contributes to reduced bundle size.
  • Minimal Configuration
    Generally requires minimal configuration to get started, focusing on simplicity and ease of use.

Possible disadvantages of rollup.js

  • Learning Curve
    Although relatively simple to use, there is still a learning curve associated with understanding its configuration and the plugin system.
  • Initial Build Time
    The initial build time can be slower compared to some other bundlers, particularly for larger projects.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Rollup.js focuses on being a minimalist tool, so it lacks some of the built-in features that other bundlers may have. Often, additional functionality needs to be added via plugins.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Not all plugins work seamlessly with Rollup.js, and there may be occasional compatibility issues, especially with plugins originally designed for other bundlers.
  • Node.js Ecosystem
    While Rollup.js excels in bundling for browsers, it is not as commonly used for Node.js applications compared to other tools like Webpack.
  • Community Size
    The community size is smaller compared to other bundling tools like Webpack, which can sometimes make finding solutions to issues more challenging.

SBT videos

Inside PWC Engine Remanufacturer SBT

More videos:

  • Review - review audio sound system milik youtuber ibnu sbt trenggalek horregg luuurrrrrr
  • Review - CEK SOUND & REVIEW SOUND OMAHAN YOUTUBER IBNU SBT TRENGGALEK

rollup.js videos

No rollup.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SBT and rollup.js)
JS Build Tools
21 21%
79% 79
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
100% 100
Front End Package Manager
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SBT and rollup.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare SBT and rollup.js

SBT Reviews

We have no reviews of SBT yet.
Be the first one to post

rollup.js Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Rollup provides much simpler configuration over webpack 4 and has a host of pre-configured plugins that are a breeze to incorporate into your project. Rollup's also the fastest of the build tools period.
Source: x-team.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, rollup.js seems to be a lot more popular than SBT. While we know about 60 links to rollup.js, we've tracked only 1 mention of SBT. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SBT mentions (1)

  • Declarative Gradle is a cool thing I am afraid of: Maven strikes back
    NOTE: I won’t mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also won’t discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, it’s no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I won’t touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because I’m not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments 👇. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

rollup.js mentions (60)

  • Valentine’s Day Breakup: React Dumps Create React App
    Vite is a modern frontend build tool used to develop fast and super efficient web applications. It serves files instantly and ensures that changes are updated immediately after they are implemented. It makes use of Rollup for optimized builds and has support for when you want to build a Javascript library (instead of a full app). - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Advanced Guide to Using Vite with React in 2025
    In 2025, mastering Vite for your React projects means leveraging powerful configurations, intelligent optimizations, and a robust plugin ecosystem. By understanding Vite’s modern architecture—native ES modules (ESM) during development and optimized Rollup bundling for production—you can significantly streamline your workflow, improve developer experience, and deliver fast, performant applications at scale. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Optimizing React Development with Vite🤩.
    6. Production-Ready Code Vite uses Rollup for production builds, which optimizes the code by bundling it efficiently, performing tree shaking, and minifying JavaScript. This results in smaller, optimized production builds that are ready for deployment. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • What is Evan You doing by creating VoidZero, and what are the issues with JS toolchains?
    Meanwhile, esbulid (developed in Go language, as introduced earlier) and rollup can also be used separately as packaging tools, and many third-party JS plugins are packaged using rollup. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Node.js: A brief history of cjs, bundlers, and esm
    Npm packages dramatically sped up the productivity of developers by being able to leverage other developers' work. However, it had a major disadvantage: cjs was not compatible with web browsers. To solve this problem, the concept of bundlers was born. Browserify was the first bundler which essentially worked by traversing an entry point and "bundling" all the require()-ed code into a single .js file compatible... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SBT and rollup.js, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.