Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login
a

SBT VS autosetup

Compare SBT VS autosetup and see what are their differences

Unimus
Unimus is a Network Automation and Configuration management (NCM) solution designed for fast deployment network-wide and ease of use. Unimus does not require learning any abstraction or templating languages, and does not require any coding skills. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

SBT logo SBT

SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

autosetup logo autosetup

autosetup is a tool, similar to autoconf, to configure a build system for the appropriate...
  • SBT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • autosetup Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-11

SBT videos

+ Add

Inside PWC Engine Remanufacturer SBT

More videos:

  • Review - review audio sound system milik youtuber ibnu sbt trenggalek horregg luuurrrrrr
  • Review - CEK SOUND & REVIEW SOUND OMAHAN YOUTUBER IBNU SBT TRENGGALEK

autosetup videos

No autosetup videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SBT and autosetup)

SBT

autosetup

JS Build Tools
78 78%
JS Build Tools
22% 22
JavaScript Package Manager
68 68%
JavaScript Package Manager
32% 32
Front End Package Manager
76 76%
Front End Package Manager
24% 24
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SBT and autosetup. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

autosetup might be a bit more popular than SBT. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to SBT. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SBT mentions (1)

  • Declarative Gradle is a cool thing I am afraid of: Maven strikes back
    NOTE: I won’t mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also won’t discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, it’s no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I won’t touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because I’m not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments 👇. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

autosetup mentions (1)

  • Guide: Hush Shell-Scripting Language
    You might love autosetup, a Tcl-based autoconf tool chain replacement. Not just Tcl-based, but designed to work with a simple Tcl subset shell called Jim, which compiles from one source code file. So you can bootstrap your project in a mostly-platform-independent with a standard C compiler as the only prerequisite. https://msteveb.github.io/autosetup/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SBT and autosetup, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

the xonsh shell - Xonsh is a Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell language and command prompt.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Loading...