Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Salt VS AWS CodePipeline

Compare Salt VS AWS CodePipeline and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Salt logo Salt

Fast, scalable and flexible software for data center automation

AWS CodePipeline logo AWS CodePipeline

Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates
  • Salt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-05
  • AWS CodePipeline Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-25

Salt features and specs

  • Scalability
    Salt is designed to be highly scalable, suitable for managing thousands of servers with ease.
  • Speed
    Salt's event-driven architecture allows for very fast data collection and task execution, enabling near real-time interactions.
  • Flexibility
    Salt provides a variety of options for remote execution, configuration management, and monitoring, catering to various needs and workflows.
  • Community and Support
    Salt has a vibrant community and strong support, which helps in troubleshooting and gaining insights from the collective expertise of its users.
  • Automation Capabilities
    Salt excels in automating complex workflows and orchestrations, allowing users to create detailed and intricate automation scripts.

Possible disadvantages of Salt

  • Complexity
    Salt can be complex to set up and configure, especially for new users who are not familiar with its architecture and components.
  • Documentation Issues
    While Salt has extensive documentation, some users find it lacking in clarity or organization, making it challenging to find specific information.
  • Resource Intensive
    Salt can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring significant system resources, especially when managing a large number of nodes.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The multitude of features and functionalities offered by Salt might result in a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Overhead
    The use of Salt's extensive features can sometimes lead to overhead, making it potentially cumbersome for simpler automation tasks.

AWS CodePipeline features and specs

  • Integration with AWS Services
    AWS CodePipeline seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodeCommit, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy, enabling a smooth and coordinated CI/CD process.
  • Scalability
    AWS CodePipeline automatically scales with your development workflows, offering the scalability needed to handle varying workloads without manual intervention.
  • Automated Workflow
    CodePipeline allows for the creation of automated, repeatable workflows for building, testing, and deploying code, which reduces human error and increases efficiency.
  • Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
    The pricing model is pay-as-you-go, so you only pay for what you use, making it cost-effective for businesses of all sizes.
  • Built-In Security
    AWS CodePipeline offers built-in security features such as AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles, ensuring that your CI/CD process adheres to best security practices.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodePipeline

  • Learning Curve
    For those who are not familiar with AWS services, there can be a considerable learning curve to effectively utilize AWS CodePipeline.
  • Limited Customization
    While the service covers many use cases, it may offer limited customization options for highly specific or complex CI/CD workflows compared to other third-party tools.
  • Service Dependency
    Heavily relying on AWS CodePipeline ties your deployment pipeline to AWS, which can be limiting if you plan to use multi-cloud environments.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can occur when connecting with external repositories or third-party tools, impacting the speed of the deployment pipeline.
  • Costs for High Usage
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for many use cases, high-frequency usage can lead to significant costs over time, especially for large-scale enterprises.

Analysis of Salt

Overall verdict

  • Salt is generally considered a good option for configuration management and automation, especially for users needing a highly scalable and flexible solution. Its strengths in speed, scalability, and simplicity make it a preferred choice for many IT professionals.

Why this product is good

  • Salt (SaltStack) is known for its agentless and lightweight architecture, which makes it efficient for configuration management and automation. It offers robust support for remote task execution, scaling from a few servers to thousands. Salt also provides a flexible and user-friendly execution model, making it suitable for rapid deployment. Additionally, it boasts a strong community and comprehensive documentation, contributing to its reliability and ease of use.

Recommended for

  • IT professionals looking for scalable configuration management
  • Organizations needing fast and reliable remote execution capabilities
  • Teams who prefer an agentless architecture
  • Developers and system administrators seeking a flexible and customizable automation solution

Analysis of AWS CodePipeline

Overall verdict

  • AWS CodePipeline is a solid option for organizations already utilizing AWS services due to its seamless integration, extensive features, and ability to support various deployment environments. It is especially beneficial for those who need a reliable and scalable solution for automating their build, test, and deploy phases.

Why this product is good

  • AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) service designed to help users automate their release pipelines for fast and reliable application updates. It integrates seamlessly with other AWS services and third-party tools, offering robust customization and scalability. Features like parallel processing, integration with AWS Lambda for build and test actions, and the ability to deploy to a wide range of AWS environments make it a versatile tool for development teams. Additionally, its pay-as-you-go pricing model makes it cost-effective for organizations of all sizes.

Recommended for

  • Organizations already using AWS services.
  • Teams looking for scalable and customizable CI/CD solutions.
  • Developers who want to integrate easily with existing AWS tools and services.
  • Companies interested in implementing DevOps practices with robust automation capabilities.

Salt videos

+ Add

Salt movie review

More videos:

  • Review - Salt - Movie Review
  • Review - 5 Best Salts For Cooking...And One To Avoid - Salt Grocery Haul

AWS CodePipeline videos

+ Add

AWS CodePipeline tutorial | Build a CI/CD Pipeline on AWS

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodePipeline - Continuous Delivery on Amazon Web Services
  • Review - AWS CodePipeline | AWS CodeDeploy | AWS CodeBuild | CodeCommit | Deploy WebApp a Hands on Lab
  • Review - Streamline Your Software Release Process Using AWS CodePipeline

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Salt and AWS CodePipeline)

Salt

AWS CodePipeline

DevOps Tools
46 46%
DevOps Tools
54% 54
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
Product Deployment
100 100%
Product Deployment
0% 0
Build Tools
100 100%
Build Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Salt and AWS CodePipeline. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Salt and AWS CodePipeline

Salt Reviews

Ansible overtakes Chef and Puppet as the top cloud configuration management tool
Breaking these results down year-over-year, use of Ansible grew from 36% in 2018 to 41% in 2019--surpassing Chef, which grew from 36% to 37%, as well as Puppet, which grew from 34% to 37%. Rounding out the list is Terraform, which experienced a jump from 20% to 31%, and Salt, which increased in usage from 13% to 18%.
Source: www.techrepublic.com

AWS CodePipeline Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service that easily and quickly automates your release pipelines for updates. Every time you change the code, AWS CodePipeline will build, test, and deploy your application. Also, it can be easily integrated with GitHub.
Source: www.lambdatest.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodePipeline seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Salt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Salt yet. Tracking of Salt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AWS CodePipeline mentions (29)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Salt and AWS CodePipeline, you can also consider the following products

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Chef - Automation for all of your technology. Overcome the complexity and rapidly ship your infrastructure and apps anywhere with automation.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Loading...