Sādu VS Buck

I'm a founder. It's hard to generate traction at a boot strapped startup. BUT THIS. Omg I will ask people to download my app all day every day so that this little one has a home! If I get removed from this group for trying to talk about a solution to climate change then so be it! Source: about 2 years ago

I just learned about a project today called Re-Climate. They are working to re-forest Ukraine and are still continuing to do the work because its their job! They are a for profit company and working with Sādu to raise awareness for nature-based solutions to climate change. Sādu runs a platform for reforestation projects for anyone to support with a monthly subscription. They also support the projects with NFTs... Source: about 2 years ago

We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I can’t just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target “opaque” - Buck wouldn’t have any knowledge of my app’s build graph so I’d lose many of the benefits it... Source: 11 months ago

Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: almost 2 years ago

That's a good bridge into saying that we don't use pretty much any standard tooling. Our build system is Buck, we use Mercurial instead of Git, and the IDE of choice seems to be Visual Studio (although Android Studio is supported, with some custom plugins required). Source: about 2 years ago