Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RunKit VS Three.js

Compare RunKit VS Three.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

RunKit logo RunKit

RunKit notebooks are interactive javascript playgrounds connected to a complete node environment right in your browser. Every npm module pre-installed.

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • RunKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

RunKit features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    RunKit provides an easy-to-use platform for prototyping and experimenting with Node.js code directly in the browser, without any setup.
  • Immediate Feedback
    The platform offers immediate execution and feedback for code snippets, making it ideal for learning and quick testing.
  • Installation-free
    There is no need to install Node.js or any other software locally as it runs completely in the browser.
  • Package Integration
    RunKit supports seamless integration with npm, allowing users to easily require and use any npm package in their code.
  • Collaboration
    Users can easily share their code with others, facilitating collaboration and peer learning.
  • Embedding
    Code snippets can be easily embedded into blogs or other web pages, enhancing content with interactive code examples.

Possible disadvantages of RunKit

  • Limited Environment
    Being a cloud-based platform, RunKit is limited in terms of custom environment configuration and local file system access.
  • Performance Constraints
    Execution performance might be constrained compared to running Node.js code locally, due to online execution limitations.
  • Dependency on Internet
    An active internet connection is necessary to use RunKit, which can be a drawback in offline scenarios.
  • Security Concerns
    Running code in a cloud environment could pose security risks, especially when dealing with sensitive data or code.
  • Feature Limitations
    Advanced Node.js features and debugging tools available in local development environments may not be supported.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

RunKit videos

Runkit - NodeJS Notebook in Bangla | Create And Publish API from Your Browser Fast And Secure

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RunKit and Three.js)
Data Science Notebooks
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Data Science And Machine Learning
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RunKit and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RunKit and Three.js

RunKit Reviews

We have no reviews of RunKit yet.
Be the first one to post

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 248 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RunKit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RunKit yet. Tracking of RunKit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RunKit and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

Observable - Interactive code examples/posts

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

TextSTAT - TextSTAT is a simple programme for the analysis of texts.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

Nodebook - Browser-based REPL notebook supporting many programming languages.

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.