I wasn't sure where to set expectations given my interrupted training, but I decided to aim for 3:03:00, as that's where my Garmin and Runalyze predicted my finish. I planned to set out at a 6:55/mi pace and adjust based on feel. Source: 6 months ago

Pre-race, Garmin estimated a 3:00:xx, and Runalyze, another great website, thought I'd hit 3:01:xx. This was slightly discouraging, but I know they're just estimates so I didn't take it personally. Source: 7 months ago

Has anyone else tried Runalyze (https://runalyze.com) to track running progress and performance? Source: 9 months ago

Https://runalyze.com/ is a great tool that can do this! Source: 12 months ago

I'm currently 5'9" and 82kg and just ran a half marathon in 1:47 a few weeks back. I lost weight while training, but started off barely being able to break an 11 minute mile back in October. The 255 would work just fine for you. If you enjoy the data side of things, there are great sites that link up to Garmin (I use runalyze.com and intervals.icu) for more information. Source: 12 months ago

Looking at cyclinganalytics.com it looks like less than 1% of people have an FTP >5.3 w/kg. I know FTP isn't everything to being a pro cyclist but it suuuuure helps. And this is based on data from people who entered their information into cyclistanalytics, so it's safe to say it's a subset of data skewed towards the higher end of the scale (since faster cyclists are more likely to own power meters & upload data to... Source: about 2 years ago