Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RSA Access Manager VS localhost.run

Compare RSA Access Manager VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

RSA Access Manager logo RSA Access Manager

RSA Access Manager is an advanced-level security management software presented by the SecureID community that allows you to manage the identity and access of the employees of your organization with proper compliances and regulations of the organizat…

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • RSA Access Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-19
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

RSA Access Manager features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security
    RSA Access Manager offers robust authentication mechanisms, ensuring secure access control and reducing unauthorized access.
  • Scalability
    The solution is designed to scale easily, accommodating growing user bases and increasing compliance needs without significant overhauls.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It integrates seamlessly with a wide range of applications and systems, enhancing its utility across different platforms and environments.
  • User Management
    Provides centralized user management features, simplifying the process of managing user credentials and permissions.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    Helps organizations meet various regulatory requirements by providing detailed access logs and reports.

Possible disadvantages of RSA Access Manager

  • Complexity
    The system can be complex to set up and manage, requiring specialized knowledge and expertise for optimal operation.
  • Cost
    Implementing and maintaining RSA Access Manager can be costly, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Customization Limitations
    While flexible, the system might have limitations in accommodating highly specific or uncommon use-cases without additional development.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some environments, the solution might introduce performance overhead, potentially impacting overall system efficiency.
  • Vendor Dependency
    Organizations may experience dependency on RSA for ongoing support and updates, which could be a consideration for long-term planning.

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RSA Access Manager and localhost.run)
Identity And Access Management
Localhost Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RSA Access Manager and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RSA Access Manager and localhost.run

RSA Access Manager Reviews

We have no reviews of RSA Access Manager yet.
Be the first one to post

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RSA Access Manager mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RSA Access Manager yet. Tracking of RSA Access Manager recommendations started around Apr 2022.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RSA Access Manager and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

CyberArk Workforce Identity - Give your workforce simple and secure access to business resources with CyberArk Workforce Identity. Empower your workforce while keeping threats out.

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Passly from ID Agent - Passly from ID Agent is an access and identity management software solution that allows you to provide the employees with the right and proper access based on their authority and company policy and regulations.

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Deep Identity - Identity and Access Management

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.