Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

rrweb VS Loom for Desktop

Compare rrweb VS Loom for Desktop and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

rrweb logo rrweb

Open source JS library to record and replay the web

Loom for Desktop logo Loom for Desktop

Powerful video recorder. Now on Desktop.
  • rrweb Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-09
  • Loom for Desktop Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-20

rrweb features and specs

  • Full Video Recording Capability
    rrweb can record and replay the whole web app experience through videos, allowing for comprehensive playback of user interactions.
  • High Fidelity Replays
    It captures almost all kinds of interactions and DOM state changes, offering very accurate reproduction of user sessions.
  • Event Compression
    The tool employs efficient event compression techniques, reducing the size of data files while maintaining detailed interactions.
  • Modular Architecture
    Its modular architecture allows developers to customize and extend functionalities according to specific needs by adding or removing plugins.
  • Open Source
    rrweb is open source, making it accessible for anyone to use, modify, or contribute to, which fosters a collaborative development environment.

Possible disadvantages of rrweb

  • Privacy Concerns
    Recording user sessions can potentially raise privacy issues, especially if sensitive data is captured, which requires careful consideration and management.
  • Performance Impact
    The inclusion of rrweb scripts can introduce additional load on web applications, possibly affecting their performance especially on slower networks or devices.
  • Complexity of Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, particularly for teams without clear documentation guidance or experience with similar tools.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    rrweb may not fully support all types of mobile interactions or behaviors, potentially leading to incomplete session replays on mobile devices.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    As a JavaScript-based tool, rrweb depends on client-side execution, which means it won't work if users have JavaScript disabled in their browsers.

Loom for Desktop features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Loom for Desktop offers a user-friendly interface that makes video recording straightforward, even for non-technical users. Its setup is quick, requiring minimal technical steps to start recording.
  • Integration
    Loom for Desktop integrates well with various tools including Slack, Gmail, and project management software, enabling seamless sharing of videos across different platforms and enhancing productivity.
  • Versatility
    The software allows users to record their entire screen, specific windows, or just the camera, providing versatility for creating different types of video content, such as tutorials, presentations, or video messages.
  • Instant Sharing
    Recorded videos are instantly uploaded to the cloud, facilitating easy and quick sharing through a simple link, minimizing the time spent on uploading and downloading large video files.
  • High-Quality Video
    Loom provides options for recording in high resolution, allowing users to produce professional-grade videos that are clear and suitable for various professional and instructional purposes.

Possible disadvantages of Loom for Desktop

  • Limited Editing Features
    Loom for Desktop has basic editing capabilities, such as trimming, but lacks advanced editing features found in dedicated video editing software, which might necessitate the use of additional tools for more complex edits.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As all videos are uploaded to the cloud, there can be privacy concerns regarding the security and unauthorized access to sensitive content, requiring users to be cautious about sharing personal or confidential information.
  • Internet Dependency
    The need for a stable internet connection can be a limitation, particularly in areas with poor connectivity, as it affects the uploading process and the ability to share videos efficiently.
  • Storage Limitations
    For users on the free plan, there are restrictions on video storage and length, which can necessitate frequent management of video files or upgrading to a paid plan for additional capacity.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic features are easy to use, maximizing the potential of more advanced features may require users to invest time in learning and exploring the software, which could be a hindrance for those seeking immediate results.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rrweb and Loom for Desktop)
Web Analytics
100 100%
0% 0
Screen Recording
0 0%
100% 100
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
Screenshot Annotation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using rrweb and Loom for Desktop. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rrweb and Loom for Desktop, you can also consider the following products

Loom - Loom is a screen recording extension for Chrome that gives people the ability to create and share media. Create your own videos using your camera, screen view, and audio. Read more about Loom.

SessionStack - Record and replay web app issues. See them the way they happened to end users.

Screencastify - Free screen recorder extension for Chrome. Capture, edit and share screencasts. No software download required. Works on Mac, Windows and Chromebooks. Screen RecorderFree screen recorder for Chrome.

Session Replay by Zarget - See how visitors view and use your site.

Screenity - The most powerful screen recorder & annotation tool for Chrome 🎥 - GitHub - alyssaxuu/screenity: The most powerful screen recorder & annotation tool for Chrome 🎥

Zipy - Zipy is a debugging and prioritization platform that provides user session replay, frontend and network monitoring in one.