RQDA VS FuzzyWuzzy

For eg- RQDA is a qualitative data analysis package wherein you could visualise themes etc. Check - https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2659&context=tqr Https://rqda.r-forge.r-project.org/. Source: over 1 year ago

Because we're on a statistics subreddit, I have to mention there are a handful of packages for doing qualitative work in R - RQDA, Q-Coder, some others - but I would not recommend it if you're not already familiar with R, or at least some programming language. There are graphical interfaces that will serve you well. Source: over 1 year ago

I’m not familiar with RQDA, but I’m assuming that you mean this. Source: over 1 year ago

You might be better off with using something like RQDA: https://rqda.r-forge.r-project.org/. It seems that it hasn’t been updated since 2016, but there might be other alternatives. Source: over 1 year ago

Do fuzzy matching (something like fuzzywuzzy maybe) to see if the the words line up (allowing for wrong words). You'll need to work out how to use scoring to work out how well aligned the two lists are. Source: over 1 year ago

Convert the original lines to full furigana and do a fuzzy match. (For reference, the original line is 貴方がこれまでに得てきた力、存分に発揮してくださいね。) You can do a regional search using the initial scene data (E60) first, and if the confidence is low, go for a slower full search. Source: over 1 year ago

It's now known as "thefuzz", see https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy. Source: almost 2 years ago

You can have a look at this library to use fuzzy search instead of looking for plaintext muck: https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy. Source: over 2 years ago

To deal with comparing the string, I found FuzzyWuzzy ratio function that is returning a score of how much the strings are similar from 0-100. Source: almost 3 years ago