Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Rev.com VS Three.js

Compare Rev.com VS Three.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Rev.com logo Rev.com

Transcriptions, captions, and subtitles that are affordable, fast, and high-quality.

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • Rev.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-02
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

Rev.com

Website
rev.com
$ Details
Release Date
2010 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
Texas
City
Austin
Founder(s)
Dan Kokotov
Employees
250 - 499

Rev.com features and specs

  • Speed
    Rev.com offers fast turnaround times, often delivering transcriptions within 24 hours or less for standard files.
  • Accuracy
    Rev.com is known for its high accuracy rate in transcription services, often exceeding 99% accuracy for clear audio.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform has an intuitive interface, making it easy to upload files and receive completed transcriptions or captions.
  • Variety of Services
    Rev.com provides a range of services including transcription, captions, subtitles, and translations.
  • Human Transcription
    Rev relies primarily on human transcribers, which generally leads to higher accuracy compared to automated transcription services.
  • Customer Support
    Rev offers responsive customer service to help address issues or concerns promptly.

Possible disadvantages of Rev.com

  • Cost
    Rev.com is relatively more expensive than some competitors, with transcription costs at $1.50 per audio minute.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Since humans handle the transcriptions, there might be concerns regarding the privacy and confidentiality of sensitive information.
  • Audio Quality Dependence
    The accuracy of the transcription can significantly drop if the audio quality is poor or has background noise.
  • Manual Review
    Despite the high accuracy, manual review is sometimes necessary to ensure the transcription meets specific formatting or content requirements.
  • Limited Languages
    While Rev.com offers transcription in multiple languages, the variety is less extensive compared to some other providers.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Rev.com videos

MAKING EASY MONEY ON REV.COM: Scam or Worth it?

More videos:

  • Review - HOW MUCH CAN YOU MAKE IN 1 WEEK ON REV? Rev.com Review (2019)
  • Review - Review of Rev.com: Is Rev Worth It?

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Rev.com and Three.js)
Transcription
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Translation Service
100 100%
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Rev.com and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Rev.com and Three.js

Rev.com Reviews

The 12 Best Notta.ai Alternatives for Better Transcription in 2024
Rev provides transcription, captioning, and subtitling services. It offers both AI-powered and human-generated solutions for converting speech to text. The platform aims to deliver fast, accurate, and cost-effective services for individuals, small teams, and large organizations.
Source: sonix.ai
Top 14 Sonix.ai Alternatives in 2025
While Sonix charges $22 per user per month plus $5 per hour fees, Rev's Max Subscription starts at $29.99 per user per month. This means if you want to transcribe 30 hours of media files, Sonix will cost around $172 ($22 + $5*30), whereas Rev will cost merely $29.99.
Source: www.notta.ai

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js should be more popular than Rev.com. It has been mentiond 248 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Rev.com mentions (79)

  • Ryanair wins screen scraping case against Booking.com in US court ruling
    Minimum wage is not applicable for gig work. It would basically be the same business model as companies like https://rev.com, which can be <$1 per video transcribed. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • **Unlocking Financial Freedom: Your Ultimate Guide to Making Money from Home**
    15. Transcription Services: If you have excellent listening and typing skills, transcription work can be a viable option. Platforms like TranscribeMe and Transcribe Speech to Text | Rev offer transcription gigs that allow you to earn money from home. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Can I automate text replacement?
    It seems like you could send it out to a translation company (like rev.com) and get a .srt that you could re-import back into Premiere. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWlm6ZCfdsQ. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • I Wanna be rich
    Freelancing by learning a skill, but also subtitles on rev.com, and if you are proficient at more than one language, try for online (live) translation job. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Online work for someone in a 3rd world country?
    There are also things like rev.com or jobsforeditors.com or various other things like teaching english online. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 days ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Rev.com and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

One Hour Translation - Professional translation services for 75 languages on a 24/7 basis.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

3PlayMedia - 3PlayMedia provides closed captioning, transcription, and subtitling solutions.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

ABBYY - ABBYY's leading AI and machine learning technology solutions range from process analysis, data capture, pdf editor, text and content recognition (OCR) and extraction, combining process and content insights to deliver digital intelligence.

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.