No Resque videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Resque should be more popular than HiveMQ. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
You can use a background job queue like Resque to scrape and process data in the background, and a scheduler like resque-scheduler to schedule jobs to run your scraper periodically. Source: almost 2 years ago
So how do we trigger such a long-running process from a Rails request? The first option that comes to mind is a background job run by some of the queuing back-ends such as Sidekiq, Resque or DelayedJob, possibly governed by ActiveJob. While this would surely work, the problem with all these solutions is that they usually have a limited number of workers available on the server and we didn’t want to potentially... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Background jobs are another limitation. Since only the Aha! Web service runs in a dynamic staging, the host environment's workers would process any Resque jobs that were sent to the shared Redis instance. If your branch hadn't updated any background-able methods, this would be no big deal. But if you were hoping to test changes to these methods, you would be out of luck. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
The Schedules worker corresponds to the appwrite-schedule service in the docker-compose file. The Schedules worker uses a Resque Scheduler under the hood and handles the scheduling of CRON jobs across Appwrite. This includes CRON jobs from the Tasks API, Webhooks API, and the functions API. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
There are a few of popular systems. A few need a database, such as Delayed::Job, while others prefer Redis, such as Resque and Sidekiq. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Do you have a preference over cloudmqtt.com or hivemq.com? Does Azure this functionality? Source: over 1 year ago
If it's IoT data, I would first send it to a Cloud MQTT Broker (cloudmqtt.com or hivemq.com). These brokers handle the spotty unstable connectivity between themselves and MQTT/IoT devices or clients. Other systems will not handle this instability in connectivity very well. Source: over 1 year ago
HiveMQ | Landshut & Remote from: Germany, UK, Spain, Austria, Switzerland | Site Reliability Engineer / Full Stack Engineer HiveMQ (https://hivemq.com) is providing a highly scalable and reliable MQTT broker that has already been battle-tested by German industry leaders ranging from the automotive and energy industry to major Internet Service providers. Tech stack: Java, VueJS, Kubernetes, AWS/Azure,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby
mosquitto - Eclipse Mosquitto is an open source (EPL/EDL licensed) message broker that implements the MQTT protocol versions 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1. Mosquitto is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices
Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.
EMQX - EMQX is an open source MQTT 5.0 broker for mission-critical IoT scenarios, massively scalable and highly available clustering, running anywhere from edge to cloud.
delayed_job - Database based asynchronous priority queue system -- Extracted from Shopify - collectiveidea/delayed_job
RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.