Redmine VS Cppcheck

Redmine Reviews

Cppcheck Reviews

Redmine mentions (7)

• Projectmanagement

  I’m using redmine. It comes with a learning curve, but has almost endless possibilities. Source: 5 months ago

• Basic ticketing system recommendations?

  Redmine. Its free and has nice features like LDAP authentication, import emails as tickets, etc. Source: about 1 year ago

• MS Office 365 and Project Management

  Planner could work and integrate well with the O365 suite. We use Redmine. It’s low cost/free and is great for small or medium size projects. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Professional Software Development at Zero Cost

  Redmine - Free, Open Source, Self-hosted. Provides issue management, source control integration, wiki, forums etc. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Atlassian products have been down for 4 days

  No love for Redmine ? https://redmine.org * Ticket tracker. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Cppcheck mentions (10)

• Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint

  I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Enforcing Memory Safety?

  Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: 11 months ago

• Static Code analysis

  For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago

• How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?

  Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago

• Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types

  Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago