
Redmine
Asana
Basecamp
Wrike
Teamwork
Teamgantt
Smartsheet
ClickUp
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Redmine
CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Cppcheck might be a bit more popular than Redmine. We know about 10 links to it since March 2021 and only 7 links to Redmine. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Iโm using redmine. It comes with a learning curve, but has almost endless possibilities. Source: over 2 years ago
Redmine. Its free and has nice features like LDAP authentication, import emails as tickets, etc. Source: over 3 years ago
Planner could work and integrate well with the O365 suite. We use Redmine. Itโs low cost/free and is great for small or medium size projects. Source: about 4 years ago
Redmine - Free, Open Source, Self-hosted. Provides issue management, source control integration, wiki, forums etc. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
No love for Redmine ? https://redmine.org * Ticket tracker. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Asana - Asana project management is an effort to re-imagine how we work together, through modern productivity software. Fast and versatile, Asana helps individuals and groups get more done.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Basecamp - A simple and elegant project management system.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Wrike - Wrike is a flexible, scalable, and easy-to-use collaborative work management software that helps high-performance teams organize and accomplish their work. Try it now.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.