Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Redaxscript VS Sitecake

Compare Redaxscript VS Sitecake and see what are their differences

InfinyHost
Smart hosting solutions for small businesses, eCommerce, and personal websites. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Redaxscript logo Redaxscript

A modern, ultra lightweight and rocket fast Content Management System.

Sitecake logo Sitecake

Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.
  • Redaxscript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-22
  • Sitecake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-11

Redaxscript videos

No Redaxscript videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Sitecake videos

+ Add

Editing a Website with Sitecake CMS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Redaxscript and Sitecake)

Redaxscript

Sitecake

CMS
8 8%
CMS
92% 92
Blogging
12 12%
Blogging
88% 88
Blogging Platform
11 11%
Blogging Platform
89% 89
Web Content Management
100 100%
Web Content Management
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Redaxscript and Sitecake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sitecake seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Redaxscript mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Redaxscript yet. Tracking of Redaxscript recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Sitecake mentions (5)

  • Maintaining this site fucking sucks
    Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS
    I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?
    Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?
    May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?
    Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Redaxscript and Sitecake, you can also consider the following products

ClassicPress - The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!

TYPO3 - TYPO3.com - Infos, SLAs, Extended Support Versions and more

Anchor CMS - Free and lightweight blogging system

Flextype - Flat-file content management system in PHP

Textpattern - Textpattern is an elegant content management system that is free, open source software.

Exposure - Turn your pictures into art.

Loading...