Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ReadyAPI Performance VS wxWidgets

Compare ReadyAPI Performance VS wxWidgets and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

ReadyAPI Performance logo ReadyAPI Performance

ReadyAPI Performance is a platform that offers Load Testing for REST and SOAP APIs, Microservices, and Databases.

wxWidgets logo wxWidgets

wxWidgets: Cross-Platform GUI Library
  • ReadyAPI Performance Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29
  • wxWidgets Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-21

ReadyAPI Performance features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    ReadyAPI Performance offers extensive capabilities for testing APIs, including automated performance testing alongside functional, security, and virtualization within a single platform. This integration ensures thorough evaluation of API behavior under various conditions.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides an intuitive graphical interface, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical users for creating and executing performance tests without requiring advanced coding skills.
  • Integration with Popular CI/CD Tools
    ReadyAPI Performance seamlessly integrates with continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools like Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and Git, facilitating automated testing and accelerated development pipelines.
  • Real-Time Analytics and Reporting
    It offers real-time analytics and dynamic reporting features that provide immediate insights into performance bottlenecks and test results, helping teams make swift data-driven decisions.
  • Support for Multiple Protocols
    The tool supports a wide range of protocols such as REST, SOAP, GraphQL, and others, enabling comprehensive performance testing across diverse API types.

Possible disadvantages of ReadyAPI Performance

  • Cost
    ReadyAPI Performance can be expensive for small businesses or individual developers, as it is a commercial product with licensing fees that might not fit all budgets.
  • Resource Intensive
    The platform might require significant system resources for running extensive performance tests, which could impact other applications if not managed properly on less powerful machines.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While ReadyAPI Performance is designed to be user-friendly, leveraging its advanced features and integrations might require a deeper learning curve and familiarity with the environment.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Some users have reported that the application can suffer from lags or slow performance, particularly when handling very large datasets or executing complex test scenarios.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to open-source solutions, ReadyAPI Performance may have less community-driven support and resources, putting more reliance on official support and documentation provided by SmartBear.

wxWidgets features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    wxWidgets allows developers to create applications that run on different platforms such as Windows, macOS, Linux, and more, without changing the codebase.
  • Native Look and Feel
    It provides a native look and feel on each platform by using the native GUI components, making applications appear more integrated with the host OS.
  • Wide Range of Widgets
    wxWidgets offers a rich set of widgets and controls, supporting complex interfaces and various types of user interactions.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The library is well-documented, with numerous tutorials, guides, and an active community to help developers troubleshoot and expand their understanding.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, wxWidgets provides the flexibility to customize and modify the library to better fit specific needs without licensing costs.

Possible disadvantages of wxWidgets

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and the complexity of configuring UI components, new users may find it challenging to learn and utilize effectively.
  • Large Binary Size
    Applications built with wxWidgets can become quite large, which might be a drawback for developers focusing on lightweight applications.
  • Platform-Specific Bugs
    Since wxWidgets aims to provide native components for each platform, sometimes this leads to platform-specific bugs that can complicate cross-platform consistency.
  • Limited Modern Features
    While wxWidgets is robust, it might lack some of the modern, cutting-edge features found in newer libraries and frameworks in terms of design and ease of use.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies for different platforms can be cumbersome, requiring additional effort in the build and deployment processes.

Analysis of wxWidgets

Overall verdict

  • wxWidgets is a solid choice for developers who need a reliable, cross-platform GUI library with a native look and behavior. Its open-source nature and mature backing make it especially appealing for projects requiring wide platform compatibility.

Why this product is good

  • Platform Independence: wxWidgets allows you to create applications that can run on multiple platforms, such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, without changing the underlying code.
  • Open Source: As an open-source library, wxWidgets is free to use and has a large community supporting it, providing extensive documentation and forums for assistance.
  • Comprehensive Feature Set: wxWidgets provides a wide range of controls and tools that enable developers to build feature-rich applications.
  • Native Look and Feel: The library utilizes the native API of the host system, which means applications built with wxWidgets often look and behave like native applications.
  • Mature and Well-Tested: Having been around for many years, wxWidgets is a mature framework with well-tested tools and a history of stability and reliability.

Recommended for

  • Developers building cross-platform desktop applications.
  • Projects that require native look and feel on different operating systems.
  • Open-source enthusiasts or developers who prefer using community-supported frameworks.
  • Teams seeking a mature and well-documented GUI solution.

ReadyAPI Performance videos

No ReadyAPI Performance videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

wxWidgets videos

Cross Platform Graphical User Interfaces in C++

More videos:

  • Demo - More Cross Platform Graphical User Interfaces in C++: Custom Controls

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ReadyAPI Performance and wxWidgets)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Rapid Application Development

User comments

Share your experience with using ReadyAPI Performance and wxWidgets. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, wxWidgets seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ReadyAPI Performance mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ReadyAPI Performance yet. Tracking of ReadyAPI Performance recommendations started around Mar 2022.

wxWidgets mentions (10)

  • YAD: Is a simple tool for developing Graphical User Interfaces
    > Are we missing somethng? wxWidgets?[1] [1]: https://wxwidgets.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 22 days ago
  • Lazarus Release 4.0
    > produce relatively small binaries for simple applications The problem is that you need to have a huge Java runtime installed or use something like Jlink which still produces very large binaries for GUI apps. I think wxWidgets is the Lazarus alternative that is the closest to what grandparent was asking for. https://wxwidgets.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • What do you think about using a game engine for UI?
    In general, people must make a choice between portability, and the breadth of optimizations. For multi-platform builds, there are single code-base frameworks available: https://quasar.dev/ For MacOS, Linux Gtk, and Windows native builds there are mature free libraries that allow both FOSS and commercial static linking: https://wxwidgets.org/ Game engines are designed to solve a single set of use-cases for... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Understanding the Layout Process in Qt Widgets
    Why do your prefer it over https://wxwidgets.org given the licenses? Personally, I was keen on Qt right up to the 5.x change over. =3. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Building KiCad 6.0.11 from source - wxWidgets problem
    I decided to compile from scratch the latest wxWidgets from wxwidgets.org. And I compiled and installed successfully for both X11 and GTK. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ReadyAPI Performance and wxWidgets, you can also consider the following products

dotCover - JetBrains dotCover is a .NET unit test runner and code coverage tool that integrates with Visual Studio.

Qt - Powerful, flexible and easy to use, Qt will help you not only meet your tight deadline, but also reduce the maintainable code by an astonishing percentage.

DevTest - Test management solution for efficient quality assurance

GTK - GTK+ is a multi-platform toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces.

CyberFlood - CyberFlood is a best-in-class solution that enables you to test the scalability and performance of your app-aware solutions.

PyQt - Riverbank | Software | PyQt | What is PyQt?