Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ReadTheDocs VS Editorially

Compare ReadTheDocs VS Editorially and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

ReadTheDocs logo ReadTheDocs

Spend your time on writing high quality documentation, not on the tools to make your documentation work.

Editorially logo Editorially

Chorus, the Vox Media stack, is an impressive suite of tools, but like anything on the web, it will never be finished. One goal, among those the team has identified for this year, stands out: a commitment to evolving the editorial workflow.
  • ReadTheDocs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • Editorially Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-23

ReadTheDocs features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    ReadTheDocs simplifies the process of generating and hosting documentation. It integrates easily with various version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, making it straightforward to deploy and update documentation.
  • Automatic Builds
    Documentation is automatically built and updated each time changes are pushed to the repository. This ensures that the docs are always in sync with the codebase.
  • Search Functionality
    Search functionality is built-in, providing users with the ability to quickly find information within the documentation.
  • Custom Themability
    ReadTheDocs supports theming and custom CSS, allowing users to personalize the look and feel of their documentation.
  • Multi-Version Support
    It supports multiple versions of documentation, making it easy to maintain and access different versions of your project’s documentation.
  • Multi-Language Support
    ReadTheDocs provides support for multiple languages, enabling users to create and manage documentation in various languages.
  • Integration with Sphinx
    As ReadTheDocs relies on Sphinx, it offers powerful extensions and integrations, enhancing the documentation capabilities with code syntax highlighting, inline citations, and API documentation generation.

Possible disadvantages of ReadTheDocs

  • Limited Customization
    While ReadTheDocs offers theming capabilities, it is still relatively limited compared to custom-built documentation sites. Customizing beyond basic theming can be challenging.
  • Performance Issues
    For very large projects, the build times can be longer, and occasional performance issues might arise, especially with extensive documentation.
  • Learning Curve
    Although it is designed to be user-friendly, integrating with Sphinx and setting up the initial configuration for complex projects can have a learning curve.
  • Dependency on Sphinx
    As ReadTheDocs relies heavily on Sphinx, any limitations or bugs within Sphinx can directly affect the documentation site's functionality.
  • Limited Control Over Hosting
    Because it's a hosted service, users have limited control over the hosting environment, which could be a limitation for some companies requiring specific deployment configurations.
  • Potential Downtime
    Since it’s a cloud service, ReadTheDocs may experience downtime or outages, which could temporarily affect the availability of the documentation.
  • Inconsistent Build Environments
    Differences between local development and the ReadTheDocs build environment can sometimes lead to inconsistencies and unexpected issues in the rendered documentation.

Editorially features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ReadTheDocs and Editorially)
Documentation
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100
Task Management
100 100%
0% 0
Markdown Editor
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ReadTheDocs and Editorially. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ReadTheDocs and Editorially

ReadTheDocs Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
ReadTheDocs is a web-based platform for building, hosting, and versioning documentation. It supports multiple languages and has built-in versioning, so you can easily switch between different versions of your documentation. It also integrates with various version control systems, including GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. Additionally, ReadTheDocs provides a hosting service...
Source: www.archbee.com

Editorially Reviews

We have no reviews of Editorially yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ReadTheDocs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ReadTheDocs mentions (2)

Editorially mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Editorially yet. Tracking of Editorially recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ReadTheDocs and Editorially, you can also consider the following products

GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.

Typewrite - The California Typewriter Company provides service and sales for all makes and models of typewriters, fax machines, printers, calculators, and even word processors.

Documize - Enterprise-grade wiki and knowledge management platform

ByLine - The easiest way to follow your favorite writers on the web

HackMD - Fast and flexible, real-time collaborative markdown, inspired by Hackpad.

Typora - A minimal Markdown reading & writing app.