Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

RapidDeploy VS Ninja Build

Compare RapidDeploy VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

SysAid
Transform your IT service delivery with SysAid's seamless automation, ensuring a consistently exceptional experience for all users effortlessly featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

RapidDeploy logo RapidDeploy

RapidDeploy is a powerful application release and deployment automation tool.

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
  • RapidDeploy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

RapidDeploy videos

No RapidDeploy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Ninja Build videos

+ Add

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RapidDeploy and Ninja Build)

RapidDeploy

Ninja Build

DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
Continuous Integration
31 31%
Continuous Integration
69% 69
JavaScript Package Manager
0 0%
JavaScript Package Manager
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RapidDeploy and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RapidDeploy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RapidDeploy yet. Tracking of RapidDeploy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 11 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RapidDeploy and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

IBM UrbanCode Build - IBM UrbanCode Build is a continuous integration and build management server optimized for the enterprise.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Apache Maven - Apache Maven is a project comprehension and management software tool.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Octopus Deploy - Octopus is a friendly deployment automation tool for .NET developers.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Loading...