Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

RabbitMQ VS Jupyter

Compare RabbitMQ VS Jupyter and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

RabbitMQ logo RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Jupyter logo Jupyter

Project Jupyter exists to develop open-source software, open-standards, and services for interactive computing across dozens of programming languages. Ready to get started? Try it in your browser Install the Notebook.
  • RabbitMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • Jupyter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-22

RabbitMQ features and specs

  • Reliability
    RabbitMQ ensures message durability by persisting messages to disk. This enhances reliability, especially for critical applications where message loss is unacceptable.
  • Flexibility
    RabbitMQ supports multiple messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, and STOMP, allowing diverse applications to communicate seamlessly.
  • Advanced Features
    RabbitMQ offers rich features such as message routing, delivery acknowledgments, and clustering, which can satisfy complex messaging needs.
  • Ease of Use
    RabbitMQ provides extensive documentation and user-friendly management tools, making it accessible for developers and administrators.
  • Scalability
    Its clustering and federated queues capabilities allow RabbitMQ to scale both vertically and horizontally to handle increased loads.
  • Transaction Support
    RabbitMQ provides support for transactions, ensuring that a series of operations can be executed atomically, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity.

Possible disadvantages of RabbitMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring RabbitMQ can be complex, especially for users who are unfamiliar with messaging brokers or have limited experience with it.
  • Overhead
    RabbitMQ can introduce overhead in terms of latency and resource consumption, which might be an issue for high-performance applications requiring low latency.
  • Maintenance
    Maintaining RabbitMQ, including tasks such as monitoring, managing clusters, and handling updates, requires ongoing effort and expertise.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its feature-rich nature and various configurations, there can be a steep learning curve for new users to master RabbitMQ.
  • Performance Issues with High Volume
    In extremely high-volume scenarios, RabbitMQ may experience performance bottlenecks and memory issues, requiring careful tuning and scaling strategies.
  • Security Considerations
    Proper security configuration, including user roles, permissions, and encryption, is essential but can be complex and critical for preventing unauthorized access.

Jupyter features and specs

  • Interactive Computing
    Jupyter allows real-time interaction with the data and code, providing immediate feedback and making it easier to experiment and iterate.
  • Rich Media Output
    It supports output in various formats including HTML, images, videos, LaTeX, and more, enhancing the ability to visualize and interpret results.
  • Language Agnostic
    Jupyter supports multiple programming languages through its kernel system (e.g., Python, R, Julia), allowing flexibility in the choice of tools.
  • Collaborative Features
    It enables collaboration through shared notebooks, version control, and platform integrations like GitHub.
  • Educational Tool
    Jupyter is widely used for teaching, thanks to its easy-to-use interface and ability to combine narrative text with code, making it ideal for assignments and tutorials.
  • Extensibility
    Jupyter is highly extensible with a large ecosystem of plugins and extensions available for various functionalities.

Possible disadvantages of Jupyter

  • Performance Issues
    For larger datasets and more complex computations, Jupyter can be slower compared to running scripts directly in a dedicated IDE.
  • Version Control Challenges
    Managing version control for Jupyter notebooks can be cumbersome, as they are not plain text files and include metadata that can make diffing and merging complex.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Jupyter notebooks can be resource-intensive, especially when working with multiple large notebooks simultaneously.
  • Security Concerns
    Because Jupyter allows code execution in the browser, it can be a potential security risk if notebooks from untrusted sources are run without restrictions.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies and ensuring that the notebook runs consistently across different environments can be challenging.
  • Less Suitable for Production
    Jupyter is often considered more as a research and educational tool rather than a production environment; transitioning from a notebook to production code can require significant refactoring.

RabbitMQ videos

+ Add

數據工程 | 快速review | 如何架設Docker Swarm + RabbitMQ？？

More videos:

  • Review - What's New in RabbitMQ—June 2012 Edition
  • Review - Feature complete: Uncovering the true cost different RabbitMQ features and configs - Jack Vanlightly

Jupyter videos

+ Add

What is Jupyter Notebook?

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Jupyter Notebook Tutorial: Introduction, Setup, and Walkthrough
  • Review - JupyterLab: The Next Generation Jupyter Web Interface

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RabbitMQ and Jupyter)

RabbitMQ

Jupyter

Data Integration
100 100%
Data Integration
0% 0
Data Science And Machine Learning
0 0%
Data Science And Machine Learning
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0
Data Dashboard
0 0%
Data Dashboard
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RabbitMQ and Jupyter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RabbitMQ and Jupyter

RabbitMQ Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
RabbitMQ is an open-source message broker software that allows applications to communicate with each other using a messaging protocol. It was developed by Rabbit Technologies and first released in 2007, which was later acquired by VMware.RabbitMQ is based on the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and provides a reliable, scalable, and interoperable messaging system.
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
However, it's important to note that every tool has its strengths and use cases. For instance, Kafka's strength lies in real-time data streaming, NATS shines with its simplicity, and RabbitMQ provides support for complex routing. In contrast, IronMQ provides an excellent balance of simplicity, durability, scalability, and ease of management, making it a powerful choice for...
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
RabbitMQ follows a standard store-and-forward pattern, allowing messages to be stored in RAM, on disk, or both. To ensure the persistence of messages, the producer can tag them as persistent, and they will be stored in a separate queue. This helps achieve message retention even after a restart or failure of the RabbitMQ server.
Source: gcore.com
6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Due to RabbitMQ’s lightweight design, it can be easily deployed on public and private clouds. RabbitMQ is backed not only by a robust support system but also offers a great developer community. Since it is open-source software it is one of the best Kafka Alternatives and RabbitMQ is free of cost.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
In this article, we will discuss an overview on RabbitMQ Alternatives. RabbitMQ has a flexible messaging system and functions as a multipurpose broker. But it often stops working, because of its high latency and very slow while doing so. The deployment & management of RabbitMQ is a too dull procedure. It can not be installed as modules, it can be installed only on machines...
Source: gokicker.com

Jupyter Reviews

Jupyter Notebook & 10 Alternatives: Data Notebook Review [2023]
Once you install nteract, you can open your notebook without having to launch the Jupyter Notebook or visit the Jupyter Lab. The nteract environment is similar to Jupyter Notebook but with more control and the possibility of extension via libraries like Papermill (notebook parameterization), Scrapbook (saving your notebook’s data and photos), and Bookstore (versioning).
Source: lakefs.io
7 best Colab alternatives in 2023
JupyterLab is the next-generation user interface for Project Jupyter. Like Colab, it's an interactive development environment for working with notebooks, code, and data. However, JupyterLab offers more flexibility as it can be self-hosted, enabling users to use their own hardware resources. It also supports extensions for integrating other services, making it a highly...
Source: deepnote.com
12 Best Jupyter Notebook Alternatives [2023] – Features, pros & cons, pricing
Jupyter Notebook is a widely popular tool for data scientists to work on data science projects. This article reviews the top 12 alternatives to Jupyter Notebook that offer additional features and capabilities.
Source: noteable.io
15 data science tools to consider using in 2021
Jupyter Notebook's roots are in the programming language Python -- it originally was part of the IPython interactive toolkit open source project before being split off in 2014. The loose combination of Julia, Python and R gave Jupyter its name; along with supporting those three languages, Jupyter has modular kernels for dozens of others.
Source: searchbusinessanalytics.techtarget.com
Top 4 Python and Data Science IDEs for 2021 and Beyond
Yep — it’s the most popular IDE among data scientists. Jupyter Notebooks made interactivity a thing, and Jupyter Lab took the user experience to the next level. It’s a minimalistic IDE that does the essentials out of the box and provides options and hacks for more advanced use.
Source: towardsdatascience.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jupyter seems to be a lot more popular than RabbitMQ. While we know about 216 links to Jupyter, we've tracked only 1 mention of RabbitMQ. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RabbitMQ mentions (1)

Jupyter mentions (216)

  • The 3 Best Python Frameworks To Build UIs for AI Apps
    Showcase and share: Easily embed UIs in Jupyter Notebook, Google Colab or share them on Hugging Face using a public link. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • LangChain: From Chains to Threads
    LangChain wasn’t designed in isolation — it was built in the data pipeline world, where every data engineer’s tool of choice was Jupyter Notebooks. Jupyter was an innovative tool, making pipeline programming easy to experiment with, iterate on, and debug. It was a perfect fit for machine learning workflows, where you preprocess data, train models, analyze outputs, and fine-tune parameters — all in a structured,... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Applied Artificial Intelligence & its role in an AGI World
    Leverage versatile resources to prototype and refine your ideas, such as Jupyter Notebooks for rapid iterations, Google Colabs for cloud-based experimentation, OpenAI’s API Playground for testing and fine-tuning prompts, and Anthropic's Prompt Engineering Library for inspiration and guidance on advanced prompting techniques. For frontend experimentation, tools like v0 are invaluable, providing a seamless way to... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Jupyter Notebook for Java
    Lately I've been working on Langgraph4J which is a Java implementation of the more famous Langgraph.js which is a Javascript library used to create agent and multi-agent workflows by Langchain. Interesting note is that [Langchain.js] uses Javascript Jupyter notebooks powered by a DENO Jupiter Kernel to implement and document How-Tos. So, I faced a dilemma on how to use (or possibly simulate) the same approach in... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • JIRA Analytics with Pandas
    One of the most convenient ways to play with datasets is to utilize Jupyter. If you are not familiar with this tool, do not worry. I will show how to use it to solve our problem. For local experiments, I like to use DataSpell by JetBrains, but there are services available online and for free. One of the most well-known services among data scientists is Kaggle. However, their notebooks don't allow you to make... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RabbitMQ and Jupyter, you can also consider the following products

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Looker - Looker makes it easy for analysts to create and curate custom data experiences—so everyone in the business can explore the data that matters to them, in the context that makes it truly meaningful.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Databricks - Databricks provides a Unified Analytics Platform that accelerates innovation by unifying data science, engineering and business.‎What is Apache Spark?

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Google BigQuery - A fully managed data warehouse for large-scale data analytics.

Loading...