Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
CJ

QuickJS VS CodeJar

Compare QuickJS VS CodeJar and see what are their differences

InboxAlly
Enterprise Email Warmup. Sender Domain Reputation Repair Tool to get out of spam and see open rates more than double in 4 to 14 days. We engage with your emails to teach mailbox providers not to send your email to the spam or the promotions folder. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

QuickJS logo QuickJS

Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and JavaScript Compilers

CodeJar logo CodeJar

CodeJar is an embeddable code editor for the browser
  • QuickJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-20
  • CodeJar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-01

QuickJS features and specs

  • Lightweight
    QuickJS is designed to be lightweight with a small footprint, making it easy to embed in applications and suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  • Fast Startup Time
    QuickJS offers very fast startup times, which can be beneficial for applications that require quick script execution without a long initialization period.
  • Full ES2020 Support
    QuickJS supports the full ES2020 specification, providing modern JavaScript features and syntax, which is advantageous for developers who want to use the latest JavaScript features.
  • Embeddability
    Being easy to integrate into other applications or systems, QuickJS provides a simple C API, which facilitates embedding it in various software and platforms.
  • Single File Distribution
    QuickJS can be distributed as a single file, simplifying packaging and distribution without needing external dependencies.
  • Memory Efficiency
    Its memory efficient design allows QuickJS to run scripts in environments with limited memory resources, making it suitable for IoT devices and embedded systems.

Possible disadvantages of QuickJS

  • Limited Ecosystem
    QuickJS, being a relatively new and niche project, has a smaller ecosystem compared to more established JavaScript engines like V8, which means fewer libraries and community resources are available.
  • Performance
    While QuickJS is efficient, it may not deliver the same high-performance execution as more mature engines like V8, especially in applications requiring intensive computational processing.
  • Lack of Long-term Support
    QuickJS may not have the same level of long-term support and ongoing development as larger projects maintained by large companies or communities.
  • Single-threaded
    QuickJS runs in a single thread, which can be a limitation for applications that require multithreading support for parallel processing.
  • Limited Debugging Tools
    Compared to more popular JavaScript engines, QuickJS has fewer debugging tools and integrations, which might make development and troubleshooting more challenging.

CodeJar features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

QuickJS videos

+ Add

QuickJS - IO, axios, redaxios, fetch

CodeJar videos

No CodeJar videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QuickJS and CodeJar)

QuickJS

CodeJar

Text Editors
65 65%
Text Editors
35% 35
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Web Development Tools
0 0%
Web Development Tools
100% 100
Application And Data
100 100%
Application And Data
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using QuickJS and CodeJar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, QuickJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 41 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

QuickJS mentions (41)

  • Servo in 2024: stats, features and donations
    And some lightweight alternatives like Bellard's QuickJS (https://bellard.org/quickjs/) in C and Kiesel (https://kiesel.dev/) in Zig. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Building Static HTML Pages with JSX Server-Side Rendering
    Built on a highly optimized JavaScript runtime powered by QuickJS, Query offers fast startup times and efficient execution. Its built-in caching mechanism further enhances performance by storing function responses, reducing database load and latency. This focus on speed makes Query a standout choice for server-side rendering, especially in applications with many components. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Lua Is So Underrated
    Which JS VMs have you tried embedding? People in this thread have suggested https://github.com/Moddable-OpenSource/moddable, and https://duktape.org/, but I haven't tried any of them. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Introducing our Next-Generation JavaScript SDK
    Where the previous SDK was built on top of the QuickJS JavaScript engine and the Javy runtime, the new SDK is built on top of the Firefox browser’s SpiderMonkey engine, and the Bytecode Alliance’s StarlingMonkey runtime and ComponentizeJS WIT bindings generator. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • QuickJS: Handle Typescript Sourcemap
    I'm currently using Bellard's QuickJS engine on a new TypeScript project. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

CodeJar mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeJar yet. Tracking of CodeJar recommendations started around Oct 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QuickJS and CodeJar, you can also consider the following products

Emscripten - Emscripten is an LLVM to JavaScript compiler.

Expr Code Editor - An embeddable code editor written in JavaScript for Expr Language.

ACE (Ajax Code Editor) - Focused and built towards coders, web designers, and web builders, ACE (Ajax Code Editor) can help...

CodeMirror - CodeMirror is a versatile text editor implemented in JavaScript for the browser.

WebAssembly - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and Languages

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Loading...