Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

QualCoder VS Wired-Marker

Compare QualCoder VS Wired-Marker and see what are their differences

QualCoder logo QualCoder

A very complete Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) written in Python. It works with text, images, and multimedia such as audios and videos.

Wired-Marker logo Wired-Marker

Wired-Marker is a permanent (indelible) highlighter that you use on Web pages.
  • QualCoder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

QualCoder is free, open source software for qualitative data analysis. You can code text, images, audio and video, write journal notes and memos. Categorise codes in a tree-like hierarchical categorisation scheme. Coding for audio and video requires the VLC media player. VLC must be installed for QualCoder to work with audio and video data. Coder comparison reports can be generated for text coding. A graph displaying codes and categories can be generated to visualise the coding hierarchy. Most reports can be exported at html, open document text (ODT) or as plain text files.

  • Wired-Marker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-12

QualCoder

$ Details
Release Date
2023 December
Startup details
Country
Australia
State
Tasmania
City
Hobart
Founder(s)
Colin Curtain

QualCoder features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    QualCoder is completely free to use, and its source code is openly accessible, allowing users to modify and improve the software according to their needs.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The software is compatible with multiple operating systems including Windows, MacOS, and Linux, making it accessible to a wider range of users.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    QualCoder offers a straightforward and intuitive interface, which can help users efficiently manage and code qualitative data.
  • Rich Feature Set
    It includes various features like text, audio, and video coding, along with memo management and codebook support, making it a comprehensive tool for qualitative research.
  • Active Development
    The software is actively maintained and updated, ensuring it adapts to user needs and integrates new features over time.

Possible disadvantages of QualCoder

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find it challenging to learn and make the most of all functionalities due to the comprehensive nature of the tool.
  • Limited Documentation
    While the software is actively developed, users might find the available documentation and resources insufficient for troubleshooting complex issues.
  • Performance Issues
    Handling large datasets can lead to performance slowdowns, which might impact the overall efficiency of the analysis process.
  • No Commercial Support
    Being a free and open-source project, it lacks the dedicated customer support that commercial tools might offer, which can be a challenge for some users.
  • Compatibility with Other Tools
    Integration with other software might be limited compared to proprietary qualitative analysis tools that offer built-in compatibility with a wider range of platforms.

Wired-Marker features and specs

  • Persistent Highlighting
    Allows users to highlight text on web pages that remains even after restarting the browser, which is useful for research and maintaining notes over multiple sessions.
  • Organizational Tools
    Offers folders and categories to organize your highlights, making it easier to manage and access important information on various topics.
  • Compatibility
    Supports a variety of websites and is browser-independent, ensuring versatility for users who access content from different sources.
  • Customizable
    Provides options for users to change the appearance of their highlights, allowing for personalized and efficient information management.

Possible disadvantages of Wired-Marker

  • Browser Dependency
    Primarily functions as an extension, meaning it is reliant on specific browsers' update schedule and might experience delays in updates or bug fixes.
  • Limited to Web Content
    Wired-Marker is specifically designed for web pages, which means it does not natively support PDF files or other document types without additional tools.
  • Potential Performance Issues
    Having multiple highlights and annotations might slow down the browser, especially on pages with extensive content or on less powerful devices.
  • User Interface
    Some users may find the user interface and organizational features to be less intuitive or outdated compared to modern web extensions, potentially hindering user experience.

QualCoder videos

QualCoder 3.5 Tutorial

More videos:

Wired-Marker videos

About Wired-Marker

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QualCoder and Wired-Marker)
Market Research
82 82%
18% 18
Internet Search
0 0%
100% 100
Text Analytics
82 82%
18% 18
Research Tools
80 80%
20% 20

User comments

Share your experience with using QualCoder and Wired-Marker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare QualCoder and Wired-Marker

QualCoder Reviews

  1. Leon van der Neut
    Effective no non-sense software

    I used Qualcoder to code 100 hours of public hearings transcripts and I found it a very pleasant experience. The workflow is intuitive and quick. Even though some transcripts went over 150.000 characters, I was using about 50 codes, and have transcripts with over 100 different coded segments, the program remained stable. Using the | character in the search field allows for the use of multiple keywords at once, which was very effective. The report function allows you to produce overviews of interview segments per code and various kinds of statistical analysis, which can be integrated with R-Studio. Many thanks to Dr. Colin Curtain for the development and software support.

    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Active community|Completely free and open source|Very stable|Intuitive workflow|Integration with r-studio
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    .pdf coding requires turning pages in file
  2. The best open source alternative to paid CAQDAS

    QualCoder is one of the best CAQDAS I have used not just because it is free and open source but also because of the functionalities and constant improvements.

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: ATLAS.ti, NVivo
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Developer is responsive to feedback/requests and makes improvements|Easy to use|Advanced features
  3. Really good alternative to paid CAQDAS

    I really like using QualCoder 3.0 for its ease of use and intuitive interface.

    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Easy to use|Intuitive|Easy merge of projects
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Only two hierarchies allowed for codes

Wired-Marker Reviews

We have no reviews of Wired-Marker yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QualCoder and Wired-Marker, you can also consider the following products

NVivo - Buy NVivo now for flexible solutions to meet your specific research and data analysis needs.ย 

Context Highlight - Context Highlight is a Firefox extension that allows you to highlight all instances (within a...

MAXQDA - a professional software for qualitative and mixed methods data analysis

Taguette - A spin on the phrase "tag it!

ATLAS.ti - ATLAS.ti is a powerful workbench for the qualitative analysis of large bodies of textual, graphical, audio and video data. It offers a variety of sophisticated tools for accomplishing the tasks associated with any systematic approach to "soft" data.

RQDA - RDQA is a R package for Qualitative Data Analysis, a free (free as freedom) qualitative analysis...