Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Qoopido.demand VS SystemJS

Compare Qoopido.demand VS SystemJS and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Qoopido.demand logo Qoopido.demand

Browser only, promise like and extremely lightweight module loader using XHR/XDR requests and localStorage caching to dynamically load JavaScript modules, JSON, HTML, CSS, text and Bundles (single script containing multiple concatenated modules) wit…

SystemJS logo SystemJS

Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.
  • Qoopido.demand Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • SystemJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-06

Qoopido.demand features and specs

  • Modular Approach
    Qoopido.demand offers a modular approach to JavaScript dependency management, allowing developers to load and manage scripts efficiently.
  • Dependency Handling
    It provides a mechanism to handle dependencies, which helps in ensuring that scripts load in the correct order and only when needed.
  • Asynchronous Loading
    The library facilitates asynchronous loading of scripts, which can lead to improved performance and user experience on the client-side.
  • Lightweight
    Qoopido.demand is lightweight, minimizing overhead and making it suitable for projects where performance is a concern.
  • Customizable
    The library can be tailored to meet specific needs, allowing developers to modify its behavior to better suit their application's requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Qoopido.demand

  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to larger projects, Qoopido.demand has a smaller community, which can lead to less frequent updates and limited resources for troubleshooting.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with its approach or those accustomed to more popular dependency managers, there might be a learning curve involved.
  • Compatibility
    There might be compatibility issues with other libraries or tools, as it might not integrate as seamlessly as more established alternatives like RequireJS or Webpack.
  • Limited Features
    While it covers essential functionality for dependency management, it might lack some advanced features offered by larger, more established tools.
  • Documentation
    Documentation might be less comprehensive compared to more popular libraries, making it harder for new users to get started or troubleshoot issues.

SystemJS features and specs

  • Universal Module Loader
    SystemJS supports loading modules in various formats, such as AMD, CommonJS, and ES modules, providing versatility in deploying applications with different module specifications.
  • Dynamic Imports
    SystemJS enables dynamic loading of modules, which allows for lazy loading of parts of applications. This can lead to performance improvements by asynchronously loading only the necessary parts of your application.
  • Compatibility
    SystemJS provides compatibility across different JavaScript environments, making it a suitable choice for projects that require running code on both browsers and Node.js.
  • Extensibility
    With a plugin system that lets developers extend its capabilities, SystemJS can be customized to handle specific loading scenarios or integrate more seamlessly with different build processes or frameworks.

Possible disadvantages of SystemJS

  • Complexity
    The flexibility and extensive feature set of SystemJS can introduce complexity in configurations and require a learning curve for new developers, particularly with its extensive plugin ecosystem.
  • Performance Overhead
    Because SystemJS is a global loader, it introduces additional runtime overhead compared to using native ES modules or simpler bundling solutions, which might impact performance.
  • Reduced Relevance with ES Modules
    With the native support for ES modules in modern browsers, the need for SystemJS has decreased, as developers can often achieve the desired module functionality with built-in browser capabilities.
  • Complex Debugging
    SystemJS's dynamic loading and transformations can make debugging more challenging, as developers may struggle with source mapping or understanding how modules are resolved.

Qoopido.demand videos

No Qoopido.demand videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SystemJS videos

+ Add

Javascript Tutorial - SystemJS intro

More videos:

  • Review - Learn Angular 2 in 21 Days: Day 2 Layout, SystemJS and Components

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Qoopido.demand and SystemJS)

Qoopido.demand

SystemJS

Web Application Bundler
38 38%
Web Application Bundler
62% 62
Frontend Development
100 100%
Frontend Development
0% 0
JS Build Tools
33 33%
JS Build Tools
67% 67
Front End Package Manager
38 38%
Front End Package Manager
62% 62

User comments

Share your experience with using Qoopido.demand and SystemJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SystemJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Qoopido.demand mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Qoopido.demand yet. Tracking of Qoopido.demand recommendations started around Mar 2021.

SystemJS mentions (4)

  • Integrate Web Component/MFE with plain static HTML
    Using the SystemJS library, we can seamlessly integrate a web component or MFE, or even import any module at runtime. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Rails upgrade to angular 2
    I would like to upgrade my existing Rails and Angular 1.x application. I'm following the ng-upgrade documentation and seeing that there are many dependencies including systemjs, typescript, tsd and a few other javascript libraries. Ideally there would be a angular-2 gem that would have all the dependencies but I'm not able to find that. Next I looked for gem's for each dependency but there isn't one for tsd. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Modern SPAs without bundlers, CDNs, or Node.js
    There's also https://github.com/systemjs/systemjs if you want more of a ponyfill approach. FWIW bundlers also don't use the browser's functionality to load modules... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • JS Modules
    A module loader interprets and loads a module written in a certain module format at runtime. Popular examples are RequireJS and SystemJS. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Qoopido.demand and SystemJS, you can also consider the following products

stealjs - Futuristic JavaScript dependency loader and builder. Speeds up application load times. Works with ES6, CommonJS, AMD, CSS, LESS and more. Simplifies modular workflows.

RequireJS - RequireJS is a JavaScript file and module loader.

JSPM - Front End Package Manager, Frontend Development, and Javascript

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

Curl.js - curl.js is small, fast, extensible module loader that handles AMD, CommonJS Modules/1.1, CSS, HTML/text, and legacy scripts. - cujojs/curl

Loading...