Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

QApt VS Synaptic

Compare QApt VS Synaptic and see what are their differences

QApt logo QApt

QApt is a collection of tools and a library providing a wrapper around APT. The intention is to ease the use of APT in Qt-based programs

Synaptic logo Synaptic

Please take a minute to watch our video, it gives an overview of Synaptic's role in financial services.
  • QApt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-18
  • Synaptic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-03

QApt features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Synaptic features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Synaptic provides a graphical user interface that simplifies the process of managing software, making it accessible even to users who might not be comfortable with command-line tools.
  • Comprehensive Package Management
    It allows users to install, remove, upgrade, and configure software packages, offering a comprehensive solution for package management on Debian-based systems.
  • Dependency Management
    Synaptic automatically handles dependencies, ensuring that all necessary additional packages are installed or updated along with the desired software.
  • Advanced Search Capabilities
    The tool offers advanced search features, making it easier for users to find specific packages or groups of packages.
  • Preview Package Changes
    Users can preview package changes before they are applied, helping to avoid unintended modifications or removals.

Possible disadvantages of Synaptic

  • Linux Specific
    Synaptic is only available for Debian-based Linux distributions, limiting its use for those on other operating systems.
  • Outdated Interface
    While functional, the graphical user interface may appear outdated compared to more modern package management tools, potentially affecting user experience.
  • No Native Support for All Package Formats
    Synaptic primarily manages Debian packages (DEB) and might not be suitable for systems or environments that use other package formats like RPM without additional configuration.
  • Requires Graphical Environment
    As a GUI-based tool, Synaptic requires a graphical environment to run, making it less useful for servers or systems without a graphical desktop environment.
  • Potential Redundancy
    There may be redundancy in functionality for users who are comfortable with command-line tools like apt-get, making Synaptic unnecessary.

QApt videos

No QApt videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Synaptic videos

Is Synaptic Drive a Worthy Custom Robo Successor? | Synaptic Drive Review

More videos:

  • Review - A look at the Synaptic 2 0 Waist Pack
  • Demo - Synaptic Amps Demo/Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QApt and Synaptic)
Software Marketplace
32 32%
68% 68
Front End Package Manager
Windows Tools
17 17%
83% 83
Package Manager
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using QApt and Synaptic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QApt and Synaptic, you can also consider the following products

GDebi - GDebi lets you install local deb packages resolving and installing its dependencies.

Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.

Deepin Package Installer - Debian package (DEB) installer for DDE

Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS

GNOME Software - A application for installing apps and updates.

Ninite - Ninite is the easiest way to install software.