Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PuTTY VS ZOC Terminal

Compare PuTTY VS ZOC Terminal and see what are their differences

PuTTY logo PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

ZOC Terminal logo ZOC Terminal

ZOC is a professional SSH/telnet client and terminal emulator. With its impressive list of emulations and features, it is a snap to access hosts and mainframes via secure shell, telnet, serial cable, modem/isdn and other methods of communication.
  • PuTTY Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13
  • ZOC Terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-08

PuTTY features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages of PuTTY

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.

ZOC Terminal features and specs

  • Versatile Connectivity
    ZOC Terminal supports a wide range of protocols such as SSH, Telnet, and serial communication, making it suitable for connecting to diverse systems and devices.
  • Tabbed Sessions
    It allows users to open multiple terminal sessions in a tabbed interface, providing a convenient way to manage different connections without cluttering the desktop.
  • Session Management
    ZOC Terminal offers robust session management features, including the ability to save sessions, organize them into folders, and quickly access frequently used connections.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    It supports scripting in languages like REXX, which can be used to automate tasks and streamline workflows, enhancing productivity for advanced users.
  • Customizability
    The terminal provides extensive customization options, including keyboard mappings, color schemes, and font styles, allowing users to tailor the interface to their preferences.

Possible disadvantages of ZOC Terminal

  • Cost
    ZOC Terminal is a commercial product, which means it requires a purchase or license for continued use, making it less appealing for those seeking a free solution.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The rich feature set and extensive customization options can be overwhelming for beginners, making it less user-friendly compared to simpler terminal emulators.
  • Limited Platform Support
    ZOC Terminal is primarily designed for Windows and macOS, which limits its availability for users on other operating systems like Linux.
  • Resource Intensive
    Due to its advanced features, ZOC Terminal may consume more system resources compared to more lightweight terminal emulators, potentially affecting performance on less powerful machines.

Analysis of PuTTY

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

PuTTY videos

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos:

  • Review - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • Review - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

ZOC Terminal videos

How to Synchronise or Open ZOC Terminal in GNS3 instead of inbuilt GNS3 putty

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PuTTY and ZOC Terminal)
SSH
90 90%
10% 10
Server Management
91 91%
9% 9
Server Configuration And Automation
OS & Utilities
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PuTTY and ZOC Terminal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PuTTY and ZOC Terminal

PuTTY Reviews

10 Best PuTTY Alternatives To Try in 2024
Instead of a full-fledged PuTTY alternative, SuperPuTTY is an add-on that changes how PuTTY looks. It also brings several additional features that are missing from the original PuTTY implementation.
10 Best PuTTY Alternatives for SSH Remote Connection
SuperPuTTY requires you to install the original PuTTY for the application to install and run. Besides that, the SuperPuTTY is an advanced PuTTY version with secure SSH connection protection with SCP and SFTP file transfers.
Source: www.tecmint.com
Looking for MobaXterm Alternative? Here are Some Options to Consider
Putty is a popular SSH and telnet client for Windows. It's lightweight, fast, and easy to use. Putty offers all the basic features you need for remote desktop access, including SSH, telnet, rlogin, and raw TCP connections. It also has a built-in serial console for connecting to serial ports. However, Putty doesn't have advanced features like file transfer, X11 forwarding,...
Top 10 Best MobaXterm Alternatives for Windows, macOS & Linux In 2021
PuTTY is, without a reservation, the top SSH customer that we can discover for Windows. Light and really basic, this customer satisfies its function: to enable us to connect to any Windows or Linux server from another location to manage it safely through the Internet. In addition, it has a series of alternatives that permit us to configure, for example, the look or conserve...
The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
The list is by no means exhaustive in any way. There are many Linux terminal emulators with dedicated following and users. Other terminal emulators that could have easily made it into my list include; xfce4-terminal, PuTTY, Tilda, or Yakuake. The default terminal emulator in Linux distros is always good enough for many users. Nailing down a favorite emulator requires you to...

ZOC Terminal Reviews

MobaXterm for Mac: Best Alternatives to MobaXterm for Mac
ZOC is a popular terminal emulator software developed for Mac OS and Windows computer. It is a reliable and elegant tool that connects you to hosts and mainframes via SSH, Telnet and Serial Cable. The impressive list of emulations and powerful features make ZOC Terminal the best alternative to MobaXterm for Mac with modern user interface.
Top 10 Best MobaXterm Alternatives for Windows, macOS & Linux In 2021
ZOC Terminal has been promoted as a popular ssh customer and terminal emulator that support Windows and macOS. It has a big list of emulations and features, that makes it among the very best tools for tasks such as connecting to hosts and mainframes utilizing a safe and secure shell, telnet, and other offered communication methods. It has a present user interface in which...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PuTTY and ZOC Terminal, you can also consider the following products

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

WinSSHTerm - A tabbed SSH solution for Windows, combining PuTTY/KiTTY, WinSCP and VcXsrv

KiTTY - KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

wezterm - GPU-accelerated cross-platform terminal emulator and multiplexer made with Rust.

ConEmu - ConEmu-Maximus5 is a full-featured local terminal for Windows devs, admins and users. Get better console window with tabs, splits, Quake style, copy+paste, DosBox and PuTTY integration, and much more.

Console2 - Console2 is a modern Windows terminal that features different profiles and color schemes, running as a system service and with support for VIP profiles.