Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PuTTY VS Graphical Ping

Compare PuTTY VS Graphical Ping and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PuTTY logo PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Graphical Ping logo Graphical Ping

Graphical Ping displays a color coded realtime graph of continuous pings to a specified host.
  • PuTTY Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13
  • Graphical Ping Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-19

PuTTY features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages of PuTTY

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.

Graphical Ping features and specs

  • Visual Representation
    Graphical Ping provides a visual representation of ping results, making it easier to understand network latency and potential issues.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It offers real-time monitoring of network connections, allowing users to see current network performance instantly.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The interface is designed to be intuitive, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users.
  • Customization Options
    Users can customize various settings such as ping intervals and visual displays to suit their specific needs.
  • Multi-host Support
    Graphical Ping allows monitoring of multiple hosts simultaneously, providing a comprehensive overview of network performance.

Possible disadvantages of Graphical Ping

  • Resource Usage
    The application might consume more system resources compared to command-line tools, which could be a concern on less powerful hardware.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    While suitable for basic monitoring, it may lack advanced diagnostic features present in other network analysis tools.
  • Platform Dependency
    Being a graphical application, it might have limitations in compatibility across different operating systems or require specific platforms to run.
  • Cost Implication
    If not free, users might have to consider the cost associated with purchasing or subscribing to the software.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Features
    While the basic features are user-friendly, users may experience a learning curve when trying to utilize more complex functionalities.

Analysis of PuTTY

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

PuTTY videos

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos:

  • Review - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • Review - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

Graphical Ping videos

No Graphical Ping videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PuTTY and Graphical Ping)
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Server Management
100 100%
0% 0
OS & Utilities
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PuTTY and Graphical Ping. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PuTTY and Graphical Ping

PuTTY Reviews

10 Best PuTTY Alternatives To Try in 2024
Instead of a full-fledged PuTTY alternative, SuperPuTTY is an add-on that changes how PuTTY looks. It also brings several additional features that are missing from the original PuTTY implementation.
10 Best PuTTY Alternatives for SSH Remote Connection
SuperPuTTY requires you to install the original PuTTY for the application to install and run. Besides that, the SuperPuTTY is an advanced PuTTY version with secure SSH connection protection with SCP and SFTP file transfers.
Source: www.tecmint.com
Looking for MobaXterm Alternative? Here are Some Options to Consider
Putty is a popular SSH and telnet client for Windows. It's lightweight, fast, and easy to use. Putty offers all the basic features you need for remote desktop access, including SSH, telnet, rlogin, and raw TCP connections. It also has a built-in serial console for connecting to serial ports. However, Putty doesn't have advanced features like file transfer, X11 forwarding,...
Top 10 Best MobaXterm Alternatives for Windows, macOS & Linux In 2021
PuTTY is, without a reservation, the top SSH customer that we can discover for Windows. Light and really basic, this customer satisfies its function: to enable us to connect to any Windows or Linux server from another location to manage it safely through the Internet. In addition, it has a series of alternatives that permit us to configure, for example, the look or conserve...
The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
The list is by no means exhaustive in any way. There are many Linux terminal emulators with dedicated following and users. Other terminal emulators that could have easily made it into my list include; xfce4-terminal, PuTTY, Tilda, or Yakuake. The default terminal emulator in Linux distros is always good enough for many users. Nailing down a favorite emulator requires you to...

Graphical Ping Reviews

We have no reviews of Graphical Ping yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Graphical Ping seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PuTTY mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PuTTY yet. Tracking of PuTTY recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Graphical Ping mentions (1)

  • Random short lag spikes?
    If you are more a GUI guy: When I'm interested in a time series of ping times, I use http://gping.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PuTTY and Graphical Ping, you can also consider the following products

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

KiTTY - KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

Fping (open source) - fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.

ConEmu - ConEmu-Maximus5 is a full-featured local terminal for Windows devs, admins and users. Get better console window with tabs, splits, Quake style, copy+paste, DosBox and PuTTY integration, and much more.

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.