Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pushover VS Screen Stream over HTTP

Compare Pushover VS Screen Stream over HTTP and see what are their differences

Pushover logo Pushover

Real-time notifications on your Android, iPhone, iPad, and Desktop

Screen Stream over HTTP logo Screen Stream over HTTP

Screen Stream over HTTP allows viewing the device screen in your web browser.
  • Pushover Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

Pushover enables your servers, scripts, and connected services to push notifications to your Android, iOS, and Desktop devices through its API and mobile apps.

  • Screen Stream over HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27

Pushover

$ Details
paid Free Trial $5.0 / One-off
Platforms
iOS Mac OSX Android Browser REST API
Release Date
2012 March

Pushover features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Support
    Pushover is available on multiple platforms including iOS, Android, and desktop, providing seamless integration across various devices.
  • Simple Integration
    The service provides easy integration with various applications and scripts, allowing developers to quickly set up notifications.
  • Reliability
    Pushover offers a reliable notification system with minimal downtime, ensuring that messages are delivered promptly.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize sounds, priorities, and retry intervals, allowing a high degree of flexibility in how notifications are managed.
  • Cost-Effective
    After a one-time fee, Pushover offers unlimited notifications, making it a cost-effective solution for individuals and small businesses.
  • API Access
    Pushover provides a robust API, making it easy for developers to send notifications programmatically.

Possible disadvantages of Pushover

  • One-Time Fee
    While the single fee is modest, the requirement to pay upfront for access can be a barrier for some users.
  • Limited Free Trial
    The free trial period is limited to 7 days, which might not be long enough for some users to make a thorough evaluation.
  • Basic Interface
    The user interface is functional but lacks the polished look and advanced features found in some other notification services.
  • Dependence on Third-Party Services
    For sending notifications, Pushover relies on third-party services, which could pose a risk if these services experience issues.
  • Limited Analytics
    Pushover does not offer comprehensive analytics or insights into notification delivery and interactions, which might be a limitation for some advanced users.

Screen Stream over HTTP features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Screen Stream over HTTP is straightforward to set up, requiring minimal technical expertise. Users can start sharing their screen simply by running the application and accessing the provided URL via a web browser.
  • Platform Agnostic
    The application streams content via HTTP, which means it can be accessed from any device with a web browser, regardless of the operating system. This makes it highly versatile and accessible.
  • No Client Installation
    Viewers don't need to install any software on their devices to view the stream. They only need to access the stream via a standard web browser.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, users and developers have the opportunity to audit the code, contribute to development, and tailor the tool to their own specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Screen Stream over HTTP

  • Limited Security
    The application does not inherently support encrypted streaming, which could expose the content to interception if not used in conjunction with additional security measures like VPNs or SSL/TLS configurations.
  • Performance Limitations
    Because it streams over HTTP, the performance might not be as high as other protocols optimized for video streaming, which could result in lag or reduced quality, especially over slower networks.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    The tool is relatively basic, lacking advanced features such as user authentication, access control, or interactive capabilities that might be found in proprietary screen sharing solutions.
  • Dependent on Network Quality
    The quality of the streaming experience is highly dependent on the network conditions, both on the host side and the viewer side. Poor network conditions can degrade the streaming quality.

Analysis of Pushover

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Pushover is a good service for those in need of real-time, flexible notification solutions. It is appreciated for its functionality, ease of use, and seamless integration capabilities, making it a reliable choice for both personal and professional use.

Why this product is good

  • Pushover is generally considered a good notification service due to its reliability, cross-platform availability, and ease of integration with various apps and services. It allows users to send real-time notifications to various devices, including smartphones, tablets, and desktops. Pushover supports both personal and group notifications and offers features like priority levels and emergency notifications, making it versatile for different use cases. Additionally, it provides a simple API, which makes it a popular choice for developers looking to implement notification functionalities into their own applications or systems.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to integrate notifications into their applications
  • Businesses needing real-time alerts for monitoring systems and workflows
  • Individuals wanting a dependable multi-platform notification service
  • Teams who need to keep group members informed with priority messages
  • Organizations requiring emergency notification systems with high reliability

Pushover videos

Pushover by Ocean Review - Amigos: Everything Amiga Podcast 238

More videos:

  • Review - PushOver - Amiga Review
  • Review - Pushover Review for the Commodore Amiga by John Gage

Screen Stream over HTTP videos

Screen Stream Over HTTP

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pushover and Screen Stream over HTTP)
Push Notifications
93 93%
7% 7
File Explorer
0 0%
100% 100
Web Push Notifications
100 100%
0% 0
API
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Pushover and Screen Stream over HTTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pushover seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 102 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pushover mentions (102)

  • AT&T Email-to-Text Gateway Service Ending June 17
    If you're looking for a way to programmatically get messages to your phone I recommend Pushover. It's reasonably priced and run by a solo dev. https://pushover.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Atlassian sunsetting Opsgenie
    Depending on what you're using it for, Pushover [0] might fit the bill. it's what I use for my home monitoring setup - low-priority alerts just go to an email folder, but a high-priority alert (such as a water leak sensor firing) will get pushed to my phone. it's a "no frills, in a good way" type of product. dirt-simple API with straightforward pricing ($5 lifetime subscription) and limits so generous I've never... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • DevOps: Linux Performance Monitoring
    Here's the output, I am printing out the CPU usage, Memory Usage, or System usage for now. We can extend the bash code and use Push notification services such as pushover, sendmail, etc. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Show HN: Webhooked.email (2023)
    Sorry I meant Pushover not Pusher. https://pushover.net/ Pushover is supposedly dead simple to use, but I've been lazy to integrate it and download the apps for my system, setup the dashboard, deploy the endpoint to handle the webhook, etc. I want a dead simple webhook to phone notification system, and I would use it in a lot of places. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Ask HN: Is there room for a new email hosting service?
    I've been using them for years and did not realize they don't allow automated emails. At some point I was sending some automated emails from one inbox to another, but they were very infrequent, less than 1 a day. If you're looking for email-based notifications, I'd recommend Pushover [0] anyways. It's more flexible (can do email, curl, etc.), free, and won't violate ToS. [0]: https://pushover.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
View more

Screen Stream over HTTP mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Screen Stream over HTTP yet. Tracking of Screen Stream over HTTP recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pushover and Screen Stream over HTTP, you can also consider the following products

Pushbullet - Pushbullet - Your devices working better together

Androidscreencast - Desktop app to control an android device remotely using mouse and keyboard.

Gotify - a simple self-hosted server for sending and receiving messages

MyPhoneExplorer - WHAT IS MY PHONE EXPLORER? Imagine if your PC could be used to keep track of your mobile phone? How would you utilize a PC client that connects to your phone? Read more about MyPhoneExplorer.

AirDroid - Access Android phone/tablet from computer remotely and securely. Manage SMS, files, photos and videos, WhatsApp, Line, WeChat and more on computer.

Vysor - Vysor lets you view and control your Android on your computer.