Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

puppeteer VS Lean Testing

Compare puppeteer VS Lean Testing and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

puppeteer logo puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

Lean Testing logo Lean Testing

Lean Testing is a free bug tracker and test case management software for high performance development teams
  • puppeteer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • Lean Testing Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-30

puppeteer features and specs

  • Headless Browsing
    Puppeteer allows headless browsing, which means you can automate and test web applications without opening a browser user interface, resulting in faster execution and lower resource usage.
  • Full Browser Control
    Enables full control over Chrome or Chromium browsers, allowing for comprehensive browser testing and automation, including taking screenshots, generating PDFs, and capturing web pages.
  • Rich API
    Offers a rich set of APIs that can control browsers, manage cookies, intercept network requests, and handle various browser events, making it versatile for different use cases.
  • Active Community
    Highly active open-source community with regular updates and a plethora of plugins and extensions, providing robust support and continuous improvements.
  • Compatibility
    Supports the latest JavaScript features and works seamlessly with popular libraries and frameworks, providing a modern development experience.

Possible disadvantages of puppeteer

  • Restricted to Chrome/Chromium
    Puppeteer is primarily designed to work with Chrome and Chromium browsers, limiting cross-browser testing capabilities compared to other tools that support multiple browsers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple instances of headless browsers can be resource-intensive in terms of CPU and memory usage, potentially affecting performance on limited hardware.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires some learning curve for developers unfamiliar with browser automation or the Puppeteer API, making initial setup and usage potentially time-consuming.
  • Lacks JavaScript Redaction
    Unlike some other tools, Puppeteer does not natively support JavaScript error redaction, which means developers must manage error handling and debugging themselves.
  • Not Ideal for GUI Tests
    Since Puppeteer is headless by default, it might not be ideal for GUI end-to-end tests that require visual validation, requiring additional tools or configurations to enable full browser displays.

Lean Testing features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Lean Testing offers a clean and intuitive interface that is easy to navigate, making it accessible for teams of varying technical expertise.
  • Collaboration Features
    The platform enables seamless collaboration among team members by providing tools for assigning tasks and tracking issues, which enhances team productivity.
  • Comprehensive Bug Tracking
    Lean Testing provides robust bug tracking capabilities, allowing users to efficiently report, track, and manage bugs throughout the development process.
  • Integration with Other Tools
    It supports integration with various other development tools, facilitating a more streamlined workflow by connecting existing project management and collaboration tools.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The tool is designed to support a wide range of platforms and devices, ensuring comprehensive testing across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Lean Testing

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to other testing tools, Lean Testing may lack some advanced features that larger or more complex projects might require, limiting its appeal to more sophisticated teams.
  • Customization Constraints
    There are some limitations on how much users can customize the platform to fit their specific workflows or preferences, which can be a drawback for teams with unique needs.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slower load times or occasional downtime, which can disrupt the testing process.
  • Limited Documentation
    The platform may have insufficient documentation or resources, making it difficult for new users to fully understand how to leverage all of its features effectively.
  • Pricing Concerns
    Depending on the subscription model, the cost may be prohibitive for smaller teams or startups, who might not find enough value relative to the expense.

puppeteer videos

Puppeteer - Video Review

More videos:

  • Review - GameSpot Reviews - Puppeteer
  • Review - CGR Undertow - PUPPETEER review for PlayStation 3

Lean Testing videos

Lean Testing | Matt Heusser | StickyMinds

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to puppeteer and Lean Testing)
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Task Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using puppeteer and Lean Testing. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare puppeteer and Lean Testing

puppeteer Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
Puppeteer offers more direct and tighter integration with Chrome or Chromium through the DevTools Protocol, unlike Selenium which abstracts the browser interaction through WebDriver, making it more versatile across different browsers but potentially less optimized for specific browser internals like those Puppeteer accesses in Chrome.
Source: bugbug.io
Best Data Scraping Tools
It is completely free. Puppeteer is well backed and supported by Google Chrome and hence replacing Selenium and PhantomJS. It automatically installs an efficient, compatible Chromium binary in its setup, therefore reducing the burden of keeping track on your browser.
Puppeteer vs Selenium
If you're looking for a better alternative, try Endtest. It has Puppeteer's speed, it supports Selenium's browsers AND it has all the features that they're missing.
Source: dev.to
Introduction to Headless Browser Testing
The Puppeteer API can be used to take screenshots, create PDFs, navigate pages, and fetch information from pages. We’ll write some example code to see Puppeteer in action.

Lean Testing Reviews

We have no reviews of Lean Testing yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, puppeteer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 106 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

puppeteer mentions (106)

  • Top React Testing Libraries in 2025
    Puppeteer is a headless browser automation tool built on Chromium. It allows developers to simulate user interactions, capture screenshots, and perform UI tests with a high degree of accuracy. Puppeteer is particularly useful for testing cross-browser compatibility and visual elements in React applications. Its robust API enables precise control over browser actions, making it a valuable tool for UI testing and... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • End-to-End SEO Testing with Playwright and Lighthouse
    Vitest is a next-generation JavaScript testing framework powered by Vite. It’s an excellent alternative to Jest, offering native TypeScript support, a fast setup, and solid performance. However, while it has an experimental headless browser, it’s not ideal for advanced scenarios like running SEO audits in CI/CD pipelines. Instead, we can pair Vitest with Pupetter, a more mature tool for headless browser automation. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • The Puppeteer Language Experiment
    This project tests how the browser language can be changed with Puppeteer. It implements multiple options to set the language of Chrome and checks each option against BrowserLeaks to see how it affected the JavaScript proeprties and HTTP headers available by the browser. For more information, see my article The Puppeteer Language Experiment on DEV.to. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Scrapy Vs. Crawlee
    In Crawlee, you can scrape JavaScript rendered websites using the built-in headless Puppeteer and Playwright browsers. It is important to note that, by default, Crawlee scrapes in headless mode. If you don't want headless, then just set headless: false. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Sometimes things simply don't work
    I am not in any way associated with the developers at puppeteer, but if you are looking for a way to contribute, they are open source. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Lean Testing mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Lean Testing yet. Tracking of Lean Testing recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing puppeteer and Lean Testing, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Redmine - Flexible project management web application

Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.

Bugs Everywhere - Bugs Everywhere is a “distributed bugtracker”, designed to complement distributed revision control systems.