Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

puppeteer VS Appium

Compare puppeteer VS Appium and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

puppeteer logo puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

Appium logo Appium

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native and hybrid mobile apps.
  • puppeteer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • Appium Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19

puppeteer features and specs

  • Headless Browsing
    Puppeteer allows headless browsing, which means you can automate and test web applications without opening a browser user interface, resulting in faster execution and lower resource usage.
  • Full Browser Control
    Enables full control over Chrome or Chromium browsers, allowing for comprehensive browser testing and automation, including taking screenshots, generating PDFs, and capturing web pages.
  • Rich API
    Offers a rich set of APIs that can control browsers, manage cookies, intercept network requests, and handle various browser events, making it versatile for different use cases.
  • Active Community
    Highly active open-source community with regular updates and a plethora of plugins and extensions, providing robust support and continuous improvements.
  • Compatibility
    Supports the latest JavaScript features and works seamlessly with popular libraries and frameworks, providing a modern development experience.

Possible disadvantages of puppeteer

  • Restricted to Chrome/Chromium
    Puppeteer is primarily designed to work with Chrome and Chromium browsers, limiting cross-browser testing capabilities compared to other tools that support multiple browsers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple instances of headless browsers can be resource-intensive in terms of CPU and memory usage, potentially affecting performance on limited hardware.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires some learning curve for developers unfamiliar with browser automation or the Puppeteer API, making initial setup and usage potentially time-consuming.
  • Lacks JavaScript Redaction
    Unlike some other tools, Puppeteer does not natively support JavaScript error redaction, which means developers must manage error handling and debugging themselves.
  • Not Ideal for GUI Tests
    Since Puppeteer is headless by default, it might not be ideal for GUI end-to-end tests that require visual validation, requiring additional tools or configurations to enable full browser displays.

Appium features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    Appium supports multiple platforms (Android, iOS, Windows), allowing the same code to automate tests across different environments without significant modification.
  • Language Agnostic
    Appium supports various programming languages such as Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, C#, and more, making it flexible for diverse development teams.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Appium is free to use and has a strong community that contributes to its continuous improvement and provides support.
  • Full Access to Back-End APIs and Databases
    Appium allows testers to access back-end APIs and databases directly, offering more control over the automated testing process.
  • Supports Real Devices and Emulators
    Appium works well with real devices, emulators, and simulators, providing flexibility in how tests are run and validated.
  • No App Modification Required
    Appium does not require any modification of your application code or recompilation, making it easier to integrate into existing development workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Appium

  • Performance Overhead
    Appium can introduce performance overhead due to its reliance on the WebDriver protocol, which may lead to slower test execution compared to some native test frameworks.
  • Complex Setup
    Setting up Appium for the first time can be complex and challenging, particularly for beginners, due to its wide range of configuration options and dependencies.
  • Limited Support for Older Devices
    Appium may have limited support for older versions of iOS and Android, which can be a problem for testing applications that need to support a wide range of devices.
  • Lack of Advanced Gesture Support
    While Appium supports basic gestures, handling complex multi-touch actions and advanced gestures can be cumbersome and sometimes unsupported.
  • Flakiness of Tests
    Automated tests using Appium can sometimes be flaky, meaning they may pass or fail inconsistently due to various external factors like network speed, timing issues, and device state.
  • Limited Support for Web Components
    Testing mobile web applications via Appium can be challenging due to limited and sometimes unstable support for web components.

Analysis of puppeteer

Overall verdict

  • Puppeteer is considered a strong choice for developers seeking a robust and efficient way to automate browser tasks. It is particularly favored in situations where headless browser actions are required due to its rich feature set and its solid support from both the community and its active development team. However, it may not be the best choice for those looking for cross-browser testing since it focuses specifically on Chrome or Chromium.

Why this product is good

  • Puppeteer is a Node.js library that provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium browsers. It is widely appreciated for its speed, reliability, and comprehensive feature set that makes it easy to automate tasks like web scraping, automated testing, and taking screenshots. Users benefit from the ability to programmatically control browser actions, which can be useful for testing user interactions and rendering dynamic content.

Recommended for

  • Web scraping projects that need to render dynamic web pages or deal with JavaScript-heavy sites.
  • Automated testing scenarios that involve simulating user interactions and verifying UI changes.
  • Performance analysis and monitoring of JavaScript execution in a controlled environment.
  • Developers who need to generate PDFs or capture screenshots from web pages programmatically.

Analysis of Appium

Overall verdict

  • Appium is generally considered a good tool for mobile app automation due to its cross-platform capabilities and extensive support for multiple languages, making it suitable for diverse development teams and projects.

Why this product is good

  • Appium is a popular open-source tool for automating mobile applications across various platforms, such as iOS and Android. It supports multiple programming languages, allowing flexibility for developers. Its community is active, providing continuous support and updates. Appium enables testing on real devices as well as simulators and emulators, enhancing its effectiveness for a variety of test scenarios.

Recommended for

    Appium is recommended for mobile app developers and QA engineers who are looking to automate the testing process for both Android and iOS applications, especially those who need cross-platform support and the ability to test on real devices.

puppeteer videos

+ Add

Puppeteer - Video Review

More videos:

  • Review - GameSpot Reviews - Puppeteer
  • Review - CGR Undertow - PUPPETEER review for PlayStation 3

Appium videos

+ Add

Appium Architecture Explained | How Appium Works | Appium Online Training | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - Jenkins CI Pipeline using Appium tests for Android and iOS by Vivek Upreti & Naresh Jain #AppiumConf
  • Review - The Xamarin Show | Episode 15: Appium Mobile Automation with Glenn Wester

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to puppeteer and Appium)

puppeteer

Appium

Automated Testing
73 73%
Automated Testing
27% 27
Browser Testing
70 70%
Browser Testing
30% 30
Browser Automation
100 100%
Browser Automation
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using puppeteer and Appium. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare puppeteer and Appium

puppeteer Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
Puppeteer offers more direct and tighter integration with Chrome or Chromium through the DevTools Protocol, unlike Selenium which abstracts the browser interaction through WebDriver, making it more versatile across different browsers but potentially less optimized for specific browser internals like those Puppeteer accesses in Chrome.
Source: bugbug.io
Best Data Scraping Tools
It is completely free. Puppeteer is well backed and supported by Google Chrome and hence replacing Selenium and PhantomJS. It automatically installs an efficient, compatible Chromium binary in its setup, therefore reducing the burden of keeping track on your browser.
Source: pamelaewallaceu.medium.com
Puppeteer vs Selenium
If you're looking for a better alternative, try Endtest. It has Puppeteer's speed, it supports Selenium's browsers AND it has all the features that they're missing.
Source: dev.to
Introduction to Headless Browser Testing
The Puppeteer API can be used to take screenshots, create PDFs, navigate pages, and fetch information from pages. We’ll write some example code to see Puppeteer in action.
Source: blog.logrocket.com

Appium Reviews

Top 5 Selenium Alternatives for Less Maintenance
Appium and Playwright closely resemble Selenium in terms of functionality but offer unique features and advantages. Both of these solutions require coding experience. Leapwork, a commercial vendor, uses Selenium under the hood to power their visual automation approach.
Source: www.leapwork.com
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2019 (Comprehensive List)
It supports automation of native, hybrid and mobile web applications built for iOS and Android. Appium uses vendor-provided automation frameworks and is based on client/server architecture.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)
It supports automation of native, hybrid and mobile web applications built for iOS and Android. Appium uses vendor-provided automation frameworks and is based on client/server architecture.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, puppeteer should be more popular than Appium. It has been mentiond 106 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

puppeteer mentions (106)

  • Top React Testing Libraries in 2025
    Puppeteer is a headless browser automation tool built on Chromium. It allows developers to simulate user interactions, capture screenshots, and perform UI tests with a high degree of accuracy. Puppeteer is particularly useful for testing cross-browser compatibility and visual elements in React applications. Its robust API enables precise control over browser actions, making it a valuable tool for UI testing and... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • End-to-End SEO Testing with Playwright and Lighthouse
    Vitest is a next-generation JavaScript testing framework powered by Vite. It’s an excellent alternative to Jest, offering native TypeScript support, a fast setup, and solid performance. However, while it has an experimental headless browser, it’s not ideal for advanced scenarios like running SEO audits in CI/CD pipelines. Instead, we can pair Vitest with Pupetter, a more mature tool for headless browser automation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • The Puppeteer Language Experiment
    This project tests how the browser language can be changed with Puppeteer. It implements multiple options to set the language of Chrome and checks each option against BrowserLeaks to see how it affected the JavaScript proeprties and HTTP headers available by the browser. For more information, see my article The Puppeteer Language Experiment on DEV.to. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Scrapy Vs. Crawlee
    In Crawlee, you can scrape JavaScript rendered websites using the built-in headless Puppeteer and Playwright browsers. It is important to note that, by default, Crawlee scrapes in headless mode. If you don't want headless, then just set headless: false. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Sometimes things simply don't work
    I am not in any way associated with the developers at puppeteer, but if you are looking for a way to contribute, they are open source. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Appium mentions (19)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing puppeteer and Appium, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.

AT Internet - Transform your data into action with our powerful and flexible digital analytics solution.

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

Loading...