Pugjs VS slim.js

I hate writing HTML. Yes, there's IDE support for inserting s but it's just annoying. Same for lists of classes or attributes etc. For everyone else feeling like me: Try pug (formerly jade) or rather it's CLI variant pug-cli. You can reuse stuff and even have JS in it to iterate through stuff or give it parameters while still feeling pretty vanilla. https://pugjs.org/api/getting-started.html. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Sounds like Time Out is a little bit limited in its rendering capabilities, but I think you could still consider using something like PugJS. Basically, you would write the master file, and any includes, then use the pug CLI to compile it down into one .html file. Source: 10 months ago

Templating engines are tools that enable developers to create HTML templates that can be dynamically generated and rendered by web applications. There are many templating engines available, but the most popular by far is Pug. Pug is a templating engine that is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It has over 21.3k stars on Github. Airbnb and Node.js use Pug templating engine. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

Are you proficient in the new UITK? If so, a Twitter Bootstrap, maybe a Pug abstraction would be VERY appreciated if sold on the asset store. Source: about 1 year ago

A much better approach is to use HTML templating languages, such as Pug and CSS frameworks, such as Tailwind CSS, to generate your HTML and CSS code on the fly. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Web component browser APIs aren't that many, and not that hard to grasp (if you don't know about them, have a look at Google's Learn HTML section and MDN's Web Components guide); But creating a web component actually requires taking care of many small things. This is where web component libraries come in very handy, freeing us of having to think about some of those things by taking care of them for us. Most of... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago