Yes, the actual results are definitely not as impressive as the overly hyped headlines, but there's still a lot. First off, in terms of research building up on top of it, as of today, Pubmed shows 9,364 articles citing their 2021 paper, and Google Scholar shows 21,719 results as a whole[1], but these include non-biomedical papers (e.g. Applications of similar ML models to other disciplines). As for actual... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

An unhealthy diet (i.e., nutrient deficient diet) harms adult brains. Unsurprising. To learn more, search for resources on pubmed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Curl -si04A "" "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=$x&sort=&page=${1-1}". - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Any thoughts on these folks (they are your direct competitor)? https://probiorahealth.com/product/probiora/ A decade or so ago, their founder started with genetically modified bacteria that supposedly outcompete wildtype strains. The regulators responded in the only sane way possible, and it didn't go to human trials, from what I can tell. List of publications from their founder:... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

This link is to PubMed, a search engine that indexes published science articles and studies. Although close to some author's names, I tried a quick search of Füm vaping but came up empty. Maybe you'll have better luck. I'd just ask one question. With zero tastebuds inside human lungs, what's the logic of inhaling nicotine-free vapor into your lungs? If going for taste, why not hold the vape in your mouth... Source: 6 months ago

What are favorite (+ least fav) places? (ex: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, europepmc.org, researchrabbitapp.com, google scholar...) I am also wondering - what is your experience regarding different sites/tools turning up more results in one area of the world or another? Source: 7 months ago