Based on our record, Process Lasso seems to be a lot more popular than Multi Commander. While we know about 129 links to Process Lasso, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Multi Commander. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
If that helps then you can try Process Lasso to automate this. Source: 5 months ago
CoreDirector is pretty straight forward and easy to use, but on my machine it caused micro-stutters even if I had higher frames. I used Process Lasso to do this, which should be the same thing CoreDirector does, but it worked better for me. Source: 5 months ago
If BES doesn't work for you, you can try Project Lasso for free: https://bitsum.com/. On this one, I've set the CPU Limiter to when the process reach 85% for 2 seconds, limit by 1 core for 1 second. You can also reduce the CPU affinity to one less core using the Windows Task Manager but this will impact the frame rate. Source: 7 months ago
I use process lasso to assign priority, cores, powerplans and 0.5ms timer resolution to processes to improve performance. (something to manage a process once run like powerplans). Source: 7 months ago
All right, here are two possible solutions I know of: Firstly you can limit the number of cores the game is using, which can increase your FPS significantly (and potentially fix the stutter as well). Why? Because Far Cry 3 and 4's optimalization on PC sucks ass, and the newer the PC setup, the more likely it will have problems with both games. How to set CPU affinity: 1. Open the game. 2. Once in-game, press... Source: 10 months ago
I often "favorite" such threads because of the alternatives listed in the comments. I use Multi Commander[0]. I have tried a few of the others over the years but for the last five years or more I haven't moved from Multi Commander. [0] http://multicommander.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
I like MultiCommander[1], which I've been using for many years, because it's quite feature rich. It would be great if there were some in-depth, feature-by-feature comparisons of all these two-pane file managers. [1] - http://multicommander.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I have grown to rely on MultiCommander (http://multicommander.com/). It is a great dual-pane file manager that is super customizable if you want to put the time in. Source: over 2 years ago
If you are looking for free software, Multi Commander (http://multicommander.com/ ) is almost as good as Total Commander. Source: over 2 years ago
Before I forget, there is also multi-commander that uses the "filesystem approach": http://multicommander.com/ http://multicommander.com/docs/browse-registry. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Process Explorer - The top window always shows a list of the currently active processes, including the names of their owning accounts, whereas the information displayed in the bottom window depends on the mode that Process Explorer is in: if it is in handle mode you'l…
Total Commander - A Shareware file manager for Windows® 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP/Vista/7, and Windows® 3.1.
htop - htop - an interactive process viewer for Unix. This is htop, an interactive process viewer for Unix systems. It is a text-mode application (for console or X terminals) and requires ncurses. Latest release: htop 2.
FreeCommander - FreeCommander is an easy-to-use alternative to the standard windows file manager. The program helps you with daily work in Windows. Here you can find all the necessary functions to manage your data stock.
Process Monitor - Monitor file system, Registry, process, thread and DLL activity in real-time.
Double Commander - Double Commander is a cross-platform open source file manager with two panels side by side.